Tuesday, October 11, 2011

The Nation interest has necessity of conservation of trees and greenery for protection of the environment.

Clipart




GYAN LAKSHAY (NGO) is active in Jawala Puri, Sunder Vihar, New Delhi-110087, past five years in maintaining friendly interaction among likeminded people and providing selfless service to the civil society. The GLNGO recently planted about 300 trees and shrubs in the area, with the help of the Volunteers. The GLNGO members and their families could often be seen checking and nurturing these trees. The intensive greenery drive of the GLNGO inspired even road walkers and nearby CWC units to join hands in this noble cause. 
The fact that cutting of more than 15cm diameter branches of green trees is a punishable offence. The Nation interest has necessity of conservation of trees and greenery for protection of the environment.






Saturday, October 8, 2011

Your MLA fund report card on signboards


NEW DELHI: Now, you don't need to fret and fume about your local MLA's accountability. If you want to know how your MLA has spent funds allocated to him /her under the local area development (LAD) scheme, you need not even file an RTI plea . All you have to do is look around for his 'report card' in the neighbourhood. The information will be up on a signboard installed at a prominent location in the area. 

This will be done in compliance with the February 10 order of the Central Information Commission. The CIC order followed a complaint filed under Section 18 of the RTI Act by one Anjali Bhardwaj and 317 citizens from SFS flats in Sheikh Sarai . The complainants had acknowledged that information was available on the government website in English, but they contended it won't be accessible to the common man. Keeping in view the aam admi's right to access information easily , the panel issued directions to erect boards with details of expenditure of MLA funds for public scrutiny . 

"A signboard of appropriate dimension will be installed, mentioning details of expenditure of the current year and of the previous year of the MLA," 
central information commissioner Shailesh Gandhi said. Though the government was supposed to put up boards by March 15 and submit a compliance report by March 25, it is still dragging its feet. 

The first set of signboards will start coming up later this week. The urban development department plans to complete installation by end of the month. The department has identified offices of the deputy commissioners, schools and hospitals where the boards will be installed.

"The board shall also mention the exact link /URL of the department website where information can be accessed. No acronym /abbreviation should be used. Information will be displayed in Hindi and shall be installed at a location having maximum public view in each constituency," the CIC order stated. The boards will not only list expenditure details, but also give information on names of projects, the agency which carried out the work, the contractor and the date of commencement and completion of work.

These boards will be maintained and updated every year, within six months of the closure of the previous fiscal, by the head of the public authority, or the officers so directed by him in writing. 


MCD School records open to public scrutiny once every month


CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Club Building (Near Post Office)
Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067
Tel: +91-11-26161796

Decision No. CIC/SG/C/2011/000930/14501
Complaint No. CIC/SG/C/2011/000930


Complainant                                      :  Mr. Saurabh Sharma,
                                                               C-7/E, D.D.A Flats, Munirka,
                                                               New Delhi-110067

Respondent                                        :  The Additional Commissioner (Education)
                                                               Municipal Corporation of Delhi
                                                                 Education Department,
                                                               15th Floor, Civic Centre, Minto Road,
                                                               New Delhi – 110 001

Complaint filed on                              :           08.06.2011     
Hearing Notice Issued on                   :           18.08.2011                                                     
Date of Hearing                                  :           08.09.2011


Facts arising from the Complaint:

The Complainant has filed the present Complaint under Section 18 of the RTI Act (hereinafter ‘the Act’), with the Commission, contending that certain categories of document including the manuals mandated under Section 4 (1) (b) of the Act 2005,  should be available in hard copy at the school.  It is further contended that these documents should be available for inspection suo moto, as the Education Department of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi runs and maintain a large number of schools in the city, they should have all the mandated information mentioned in Section 4, in hard copy at the school premise for the benefit of the beneficiary community. This will be of immense help for them in ensuring transparency and accountability of the functioning of schools. He has forwarded a list of documents that should be available for inspection and the request is reproduced below:-

1.     Admission records
2.     Students’ attendance records
3.     Teachers’ attendance records
4.     Budget Allocations, Sanction issued and Expenditure incurred
5.     Expenditure on Educational Tours, Mid Day Meals, V.K.S/SMC, Sanitation, and CEP heads.
6.     Records of disbursements made to students on account of Scholarships, Uniforms, Books, and all other incentives given under any scheme.
7.     Copies of Circulars/Notifications/Orders received from Education Department & other Departments/Authorities from time to time.
8.     Various Registers like inspection Register, Visitor Register, Movement Register
9.     General Inspection of the infrastructural facilities – like drinking water, toilets, classrooms etc.

Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:
The following were present:-
Appellant: Mr. Saurabh Sharma and Ms. Aheli Chowdhury.
Respondent:  Mrs. Kanta Rani Kumar, ADE; Dr. Chandra Bhan, DDE (Coordination); Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Commission has heard the Respondents and the Appellant. The Respondents state that the admission records can be made available for inspection, as well as the student’s attendance. The teacher’s attendance records/register is also available. Budget allocations are at the HQ and Zonal Level, the budget sanctioned to the schools and the expenditure therein is available at the school level.  For educational tours and mid-day meal can be made available for inspection at the school. The records for PTA are also maintained at the school. It is further stated that for sanitation, only one staff is deployed.  Records of disbursements made to students on account of Scholarships, Uniforms, Books which are free of cost, and all other incentives for winter clothes/shoes etc given under any scheme are also available. Copies of Circulars/Notifications/Orders received from Education Department & other Departments/Authorities from time to time are sent directly to the schools and should be available there. Various Registers like inspection Register, Visitor Register, Movement Register are also at the school level. Inspections are done once a year and also surprise inspection records are also available. General Inspection of the infrastructural facilities – like drinking water, toilets, classrooms, black boards etc are undertaken through a specific proforma which covers a variety of areas, this record is available. In addition the Respondents also state that there are also records of complaints made by Principal/incharge  of each school to senior authorities.
Section 4 (1) (a) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, which is a mandatory obligation, reads as -“maintain all its records duly catalogued and indexed in a manner and the form which facilitates the right to information under this Act and ensure that all records that are appropriate to be computerised are, within a reasonable time and subject to availability of resources, computerised and connected through a network all over the country on different systems so that access to such records is facilitated”. The Commission appreciates that the Department has made improvements and is moving towards  better transparency.
The Right to Information is a fundamental right of the citizens which has been codified by the RTI act, No. 22 of 2005. The act envisions that all citizens shall receive information primarily by suo motodisclosures by various public authorities as prescribed by section (4) of the act.                Disclosures in accordance with the said Section are crucial to ensure transparency and accountability in institutions.  This would reduce the load of RTI Applications being filed with each institution as information would be freely available to citizens and they would not have to apply for it. It further envisages that citizens would be required to specifically ask for information under section (6) only in a few cases. Citizens have been demanding that certain information is essential to them and should be available proactively in form of public notice boards, display boards etc. The Commission feels that certain information which is essential for public safety should be published proactively.

Decision:
The Complaint is allowed. 
In view of the aforesaid and from the facts before it, the Commission under the powers vested in it by section 19 (8) (a) of the RTI act, hereby directs the following:-
The Following categories of documents shall be available for inspection from the last working day of October 2011, pertaining to each particular school for the on-going academic session.
1.     Admission records
2.     Students’ attendance records
3.     Teachers’ attendance records
4.     Budget Allocations, Sanction issued and Expenditure incurred
5.     Expenditure on Educational Tours, Mid Day Meals, V.K.S/SMC, Sanitation,  
6.     Records of disbursements made to students on account of Scholarships, Uniforms, Books, and all other incentives given under any scheme.
7.     Copies of Circulars/Notifications/Orders received from Directorate of Education & other Departments/Authorities from time to time, which are available with the concerned school.
8.     Various Registers like inspection Register, Visitor Register, Movement Register, Complaint File
1.     All schools of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi will have the above noted documents/registers available for inspection by citizens on the last working day of each month, from 10.30 AM to 12.30 PM for First/Morning/General Shift and 3.30 PM to 5.30 PM for the Second/Evening shift schools respectively. This information regarding inspection timings shall be available on the notice boards of all schools.
1.     A sign board of appropriate dimension shall be installed, mentioning the Name(s), designation(s), contact details including the office address/room number, as the case may be who can be contacted for inspecting records including the inspection timings as mentioned in point 1 above. No acronym/abbreviation should be used.  This information shall be inscribed in Hindi and shall be installed at a location having maximum public view at the concerned school. The same shall also be published on the website of the Corporation also.
The Additional Commissioner (Education), shall send a consolidated report of compliance of the above directions to this Commission by 15thNovember 2011. The report may be sent to rtimonitoring@gmail.com, with a copy to the Complainant.   

This decision is announced in open chamber.
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.


                                                                                                                          Shailesh Gandhi
                                                                                                          Information Commissioner
                                                                                                                   8th  September 2011

Monday, October 3, 2011

RTI activist Raghubir Singh Gadegawnlia got ‘B’ Grade position in India in Certificate Course on RTI


RTI activist Raghubir Singh Gadegawnlia got ‘B’ Grade position in India in Certificate Course on RTI
DELHI: Raghubir Singh Gadegawnlia, resident of  Jawala Puri district West Delhi based RTI activist got B grade position in India in Certificate Course on RTI' launched by the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT), Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, Government of India (GoI). Gadegawnlia got 3rd rank in India, out of 41 students.
Certificate Course on RTI' is for various stakeholders on, both, the demand and supply sides of the RTI implementation regime. This Online Certificate Course on RTI is launched in association with the Centre for Good Governance, Hyderabad.
This Certificate Course is aimed for Public Information Officers (PIOs), Assistant Public Information Officers (APIOs), Appellate Authorities, Officials assisting the above designated officers or other public officials, Representative of Civil Society Organizations (including Media Organizations) .
The outcomes proposed for this initiative are a sound knowledge of the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 among the people taking this course. Good understanding of the remedies available when an implementing organization fails to comply with this Act, Testing the understanding of 'Information Providers' and 'Information Seekers' using this tool for implementing this Act or exercising their right under it.
It is to be remembered that Raghubir Singh Gadegawnlia is an active member of different social organizations & giving training about RTI Act to different organizations & citizens.

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Govt Opposes Rs 50k Cap on Free Treatment of Poor

The Delhi government today turned down a proposal of private hospitals to provide free treatment to poor patients only up to billing amount of Rs 50,000 and sought a direction from the Supreme Court to prohibit them from putting any such cap.

It said the proposal for putting a ceiling "is not practicable" and totally "unacceptable".

In an affidavit filed before the apex court, the government informed the court that out of 37 hospitals, which were given land at subsidised rate, 27 are giving free treatment to the economically weaker section (EWS) of society but some have proposed a ceiling of the Rs 50,000 per patient.

"A perusal of their (hospital's) proposals reveals that they have agreed to provide free treatment to EWS patients free of cost subject to billing amount limit of Rs 50,000 per patient. This is totally against the letter and spirit of providing free treatment to poor patients.

"If the above proposal is to be accepted then many poor patients would be denied complete and full treatment for their illness and this would defeat the very aim and objective of providing free treatment to poor patients. A cap or ceiling of the Rs 50,000 per patient is not practicable. This is totally unacceptable to the government," the 11-page affidavit said.

It said that four hospitals -- Fortis Escort Heart Institute; Max Super Specialty, Saket; Max Super Specialty, IP Extension; and Bhagwati Hospital -- did not submit their representation in a meeting which was organised on the direction of the apex court to chart out a scheme for the implementation of the scheme for free treatment.

"It appears that they have fallen in line with the directions of the high court and also the policy of the government to serve the interest of EWS category of the society," the government said.

The affidavit was filed in compliance with the apex court order which had on August 25 had directed the government to file a detailed report after consultation with the hospitals.

It had asked the hospitals to sit with government authorities to sort out the issue and work out a scheme to treat the poor patients — 25 per cent outdoor and 10 per cent indoor — free of cost.

The government also informed the court that a five-member monitoring committee under the Director of Health Services has been formed for the implementation of the scheme.

The Delhi High Court had in 2007 ruled that all private hospitals that were granted public land at cheaper rates would provide free treatment to poor patients at the rate of 10 per cent in the indoor patient department (IPD) and 25 per cent in the outdoor patient department (OPD) of their total respective treatment capacities.

"They (poor patients) will be provided free admission, bed, medication, treatment, surgery facility, nursing facility and consumables and non-consumables. The hospitals charging any money from such patients shall be liable to be proceeded against in accordance with the law. Besides that, this would be treated as violation of the orders of the court," the high court had said.

The court had pronounced the judgment on a PIL seeking implementation of the land deed agreement entered into with these hospitals providing for, among other things, free treatment to certain percentage of poor patients out of their total treatment capacities.

Delhi Govt Officials to Pay Penalty For Delay in Service

Come September 15, Delhi government officials will have to pay financial penalty to applicants if they fail to deliver services within a time-frame, a move that comes in the backdrop of Anna Hazare's demand for a citizens' charter.

The reforms in delivery of services like issuance of driving license, ration card and registration of births and deaths in a time-bound manner has been initiated by city government as per provision of a legislation passed by Delhi Assembly in March.

The decision to implement the 'Delhi Right of Citizen to Time Bound Delivery of Services Act' comes close on the heels of Hazare's agitation demanding a Citizens' Charter for all government departments, providing details about services offered by them, the time limit and punishment for failing to provide the service.

The legislation fixes financial penalty in the range of Rs10 to Rs 200 per day for failing to deliver services while making it a right of every citizen to obtain time bound delivery of services from certain government agencies.

"The legislation will come into force from September 15. It will improve accountability and rid our system of irregularities," said a senior official.

The departments which have been included under the legislation are Revenue, Food and Civil Supplies, Transport and Trade and Taxes as well as civic agencies MCD and NDMC.

According to the legislation, a maximum penalty of Rs 5,000 can be imposed on officials for failing to deliver services. For deciding financial penalty, the legislation also provides for setting up "competent authority".

The legislation says for issuance of ration cards, it should not take more than 45 days while MCD and NDMC should not take more than seven working days for issuance of registration of birth and death certificates.

The Transport Department should not take more than one day to renew permanent driving license while learner's driving license should be issued on the same day of filing of the application.

The Act requires the selected departments to commit to service-level agreements (SLAs) declaring time-frame required to deliver services to the citizens.

The legislation basically aims at sensitising government servants towards the citizens and to enhance and imbibe a culture to deliver services within a stipulated period.

Officials said the government had written to Delhi Police to implement the legislation.

Friday, August 5, 2011

Sample RTI Application format crime against women and dowry related cases

To

The CPIO
O/o The Superintendent of Police XXXXXX
address

Subject: Request for information required under RTI Act 2005

Ref: My complaint dated 4-Oct-2009 sent through speed post no. ABCDEF1234IN (copy enclosed) for registration of case against Mrs. xxxxxxxxx and accomplices under section 3 of dowry prohibition act, 1961.

Dear Sir,

With reference to my complaint (copy enclosed as Annexure A) dated 4-Oct, Please provide me the following information under the provisions of RTI Act 2005:-

1. Action taken report by your department in compliance with my complaint.

2. What are the provisions invoked in the CAW Cell to prevent any manipulation of statements given by Bride & Groom since CAW Cell never gives receiving of the statements given to enquiry officer.

3. Whether the CAW Cell Nanak Pura, Delhi and all other related police officials who deal with marital disputes, crime against women and dowry related cases are aware that giving dowry is a cognizable offence under section 3 of dowry prohibition act, 1961 and there’s a penalty of imprisonment up to 5 years for giving dowry or abetting the giving of dowry.

4. Whether the CAW Cell Nanak Pura, Delhi and all other related police officials who deal with marital disputes and dowry related cases are aware of Rule 2 of the Dowry Prohibition (Maintenance of List of Presents to the Bride and Bridegroom) Rules, 1985. If the answer is yes, then are they complying the provisions of the Dowry Prohibition Rules, 1985 while accepting complaints from women?

5. Whether CAW Cell is aware of the High Court Judgment in respect of CRL.M.C.7262/2006 dated 23-02-2007.(Attached as Annexure B), which states that

a) “Where these kinds of allegations are made, the police should simultaneously register a case under Dowry Prohibition Act (in short, the Act) against the parents of the complainant as well, who married their daughter despite demand of dowry. Section 3 of the Act prohibits giving and taking of dowry. If a woman of grown up age and well educated gets married to a person despite dowry demand, she and her family becomes accomplice in the crime under Dowry Prohibition Act.”

b) “Police should insist upon the compliance of the Rules under Dowry Prohibition Act and should not entertain any complaint, if the rules have not been complied with. Rule 2 of the Dowry Prohibition (Maintenance of List of Presents to the Bride and Bridegroom) Rules, 1985.”

6. How many FIR’s have been filed against dowry takers since year 2001 till date, year wise.

7. How many FIR’s have been filed against dowry givers since year 2001 till date, year wise.

8. Supreme Court of India has also declared the misuse of 498A as legal terrorism, so whether CAW Cell /Concerned police station are considering the Income Tax Return of bride and her family who claims for huge expenses before accepting the complaints of women. As CAW cell is responsible for case recommendations on the preliminary stage for filing of FIR on the martial disputes, therefore what are the actions and measures available at the CAW cell to prevent the registration of such false complaint. Because false and fabricated complaints are increasing the burden on Police and Judiciary system.
9. Kindly provide details of the various provisions/actions taken by CAW Cell against the concerned Enquiry Officer or other staff involved if the list of Stridhan submitted by brides accepted due to failure /negligence of compliance of any Act/Judgments mentioned above.
The information sought by the undersigned falls within the ambit of RTI Act and the information is existing therein. It is further requested that the High Court Judgment WP{C} No. 3114/2007 dated 19-11-2007 (Annexure C) and decision of Central Information Commission under appeal no. CIC/WB/A/2007/00264 dated 02/03/2007 (Annexure D) and under appeal no. CIC/WB/A/2007/00336 dated 02/03/2007 (Annexure E) may please be considered before invoking the provisions of Section 8 of RTI Act 2005.

Provide information to each point separately. No clubbing of points even if information is repeated.

Your early reply will be appreciated.

Thanking You
Best Regards
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Enclosed:
Annexure A:
Annexure B:
Annexure C:
Annexure D:
Annexure E:
Complier : xyz