Samarpita Banerjee : Tue Apr 17
2012, 03:17 hrs
With the aim of propagating social inclusiveness, the Supreme
Court last week gave the landmark decision of upholding the constitutional
validity of the Right to Education. While hundreds of schools across the city
lauded court’s decision saying it was their moral responsibility to ensure
every child get education, activists expressed concern about the implementation
of the law.
“Only
time will tell how the schools go about implementing the Supreme Court ruling.
Private schools will certainly look for ways to increase their revenue since
their income from fees of these students will be affected,” said Jayshree
Marale, a retired principal of a civic school.
Marale
said it is now certain that private schools will resort to increasing fees.
“Here the role of the state government will be very crucial. The state
government has to ensure that schools do not arbitrarily increase their fees.
Schools like the one in the city that refused to reduce fees despite protest
from parents should be dealt with sternly,” she said. “There will be some
schools providing excuses like non-availability of poor students seeking
admission in their institute. All these should not be tolerated,” she added.
According
to the judgment, all private unaided schools across the country will have to
reserve 25 per cent of their seats for students from economically and socially
weaker sections staying in the vicinity of the school.
The
judgment said, “The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act,
2009, is constitutionally valid and shall apply to a school established, owned,
or controlled by the appropriate Government or local authority; an aided school
including aided minority school (s) receiving aid or grants to meet whole or
part of its expenses from the appropriate Government or local authority for a
school belonging to specified category and an unaided non-minority school not
receiving any kind of aid or grants to meet its expenses from the appropriate
Government or the local authority.”
The court
also made it clear that the unaided minority schools will not need to follow
this directive. The decision was taken by a bench comprising Chief Justice SH
Kapadia and justice KS Radhakrishnan and justice Swantanter Kumar. The
government had first introduced the law in April 2010. However, at that time
many schools had protested against it saying that a law like this would be
unfair for the remaining 75 per cent because they would need to increase their
fees to meet the growing expenses.
However,
while declaring its decision, the court said that administering primary
education to such children should be seen as a charitable activity and a
student from an economically weak background should not be denied admission on
the grounds of financial difficulty.
No comments:
Post a Comment