Showing posts with label RTE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RTE. Show all posts

Thursday, October 18, 2012

City's orphans have a shot at education now


Shaswati Das, Hindustan Times, New Delhi, October 18, 2012

The Capital's orphans are going to get a chance at education and subsequently a better life with the Delhi government notifying that such children will have an equal right as per Right to Education (RTE) Act guidelines.

An orphan as defined by the Juvenile Justice Care and Protection of Children Rules is a child who is without parents or willing and capable legal or natural guardian. Such a child will have to be given admission under the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) category, the government notice said.
"Starting this academic session, orphans will now be considered for admission in all schools under the EWS category. This is an attempt at giving them as much of a chance at gaining formal education as any other child. All schools will, therefore, be required to consider applications of orphan children as well," said Amit Singla, director of education, Delhi government.
While the child will need a certificate from the Women and Child Development department to be eligible for admission, schools maintained that no separate provision would be made for these children.
"Orphans will not be considered separately but will be included in the 25% EWS category itself. This is because the child will either come through an orphanage or the Delhi government. So children from all disadvantaged groups will fall under the EWS category," said Ameeta Wattal, vice chairperson, vice chairperson, National Progressive Schools Conference.
Yet, this directive may not necessarily spell good news for children belonging to this category. Thanks to the lottery system followed by schools, the odds against and those in favour of an orphan child being selected for nursery admission are equal.
"Our task is to provide a chance to underprivileged children and ensure that they are provided quality education. These children will also be subject to the lottery system under the EWS category so that the chance of an orphan is as much or as little as any other child under the category," Wattal added.

Pvt school flouts rules, makes EWS child pay for midday meal


New Delhi, October 16, 2012, DHNS:
Law says poor students can’t be charged fees of any kind
A pre-school student from the economically weaker section has been charged Rs 500 for two months by a private school for the food served under the government-funded midday meal scheme.
Activists say Dayanand Model School in Patel Nagar is violating regulations as schools are not supposed to charge any fee to poor students admitted under the EWS quota. 

Schools are also supposed to be get government funds if they decide to provide midday meals to EWS students, though private schools have complained in the past that they don’t get adequate funds for this.

No school fee


Kamlesh, the student’s mother, said the school did not charge anything from them for his admission, but is charging for lunch provided by the school for the last two months. The payment was made to the school through Allahabad Bank in East Patel Nagar. 

“The school has charged Rs 250 per month. I was not aware that we were not supposed to pay for any provisions given by the school to students who are studying for free. Shubham has been going to this school for four months now,” said Kamlesh, who works as a maid.

Parents were recently called by the school authorities and they were asked to pay more money for the school meal for September and October. 

“When she approached me regarding this issue, I stopped her from paying for these two months as under the EWS category schools are not supposed to charge children any kind of fee,” said advocate Kusum Sharma. 

She added private schools which opt for the midday meal scheme can’t charge even non-EWS students for it.

Breaking rules
Social Jurist, a rights group, has written to the directorate of education and the school to look into the issue. “Under the provisions of the Right to Education Act, 2009 read with the Delhi RTE Rules, 2011 the school is obliged to provide all facilities to EWS students free of cost. You are requested to stop demanding any amount from EWS students on account of midday meal,” reads the letter.

Refund sought

Social Jurist has also demanded that the school refund the amount taken from EWS students towards midday meal. When contacted, the school authorities said the allegations were baseless and refused to give any explanation.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Bangalore: Irked by RTE school cuts hair of poor students



Dailybhaskar.com | Jul 18, 2012, 11:05AM IST
Bangalore: In a shocking incident came to light on Tuesday, a private school here allegedly cut off tufts of hair on top of the heads of four children who were admitted there under the Right to Education (RTE) quota. This was done to reportedly distinguish these children, admitted under the RTE quota, from other students.
As per a report published in The Hindu, the parents of the children, admitted in standard I in the school at Nandini Layout, allege students admitted under the RTE quota are made to stand separately during the assembly and their lunch boxes are checked before they enter their class. They allege that the names of their wards have not been entered in the attendance register. The school reportedly makes them sit in the back benches and they are not given any homework.
Incidentally, this school is part of the Karnataka Unaided School Managements’ Association (KUSMA) that is vehemently opposed to implementation of the RTE quota of 25 percent in city schools. Several schools under KUSMA, including this one, remained closed for the second day as part of the association’s weeklong protest against implementation of the RTE.

Has ‘ambitious’ RTE Act failed? No admission for EWS’ students


DNA | Sep 17, 2012, 04:59AM IST
Ahmedabad: The ambitious initiative of the Union government to revolutionise the education system through the Right to Education (RTE) Act seems to be a pipe dream as schools in city have found loopholes in the act to avoid inducting children from economically weaker section (EWS).
While many schools claim that there is lack of awareness about RTE among the EWS, others blame it on the government for not providing information to the deserving people. “There is no awareness among people about the act (RTE). The government should make even the act of providing information about the act official,” said Manan Choksi, managing director, Udgam School.
Citing the provisions, HB Kapadia School which is a minority institution said that it is exempted from the act. The RTE says that schools registered as minority institutions don’t fall within the purview of the act.
“Since our school is registered as a minority institution, the RTE is not applicable to us,” was the reply of Muktak Kapadia, trustee of HB Kapadia School. However, some schools have a different story to tell. Schools claim that they are open to admissions for poor students, but haven’t received any applications. “We are open to take students under RTE but have not received any application so far. The government has not clarified anything about the funding of RTE students,” said Jayshree Joshi, principal of Satwa Vikas School. Another city school CN Vidyalaya, which has recently introduced English medium also cites similar reasons behind its inability to induct children from the weaker sections. Lack of awareness is not the only hindrance. Raising doubts about how EWS students will gel with regular students, principal of Anand Niketan school, Nashy Chauhan, said, “It will be difficult for EWS students to cope with the regular ones when they join in class 1 as the regular students would have got a different exposure in kindergarten.”
In addition, residential schools are also exempted from RTE purview. “Satwa Vikas comes partly under residential school. So, we are not under obligation to take students under RTE,” said an official of Satwa Vikas School.
Meanwhile, Kendriya Vidyalaya where RTE has been implemented doesn’t have a school monitoring committee (SMC) to monitor the process of act’s implementation. It is a violation of RTE norms whereby it is necessary for schools to have SMC which is supposed to report to the state government about the status of RTE. “The students of EWS in our school buy uniforms, books and other stationeries, they should provide us the bill which the school will later reimburse,” said Rohit Das Kumar, principal of the school.
However, some schools in the city have started taking in students under the act. St Kabir School has been implementing the act for the last three years. “We do not expect any monetary assistance from the government. The school bears the fee and other requirements of RTE students on its own,” Rashmi Trivedi, principal of St Kabir School said. Another prominent city school, Riverside has also implemented the act since its inception.

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Reserve 25 pc for poor in every class: HC


Ashish Tripathi, June 2, 2012, New Delhi:
Schools admitting new students to any class will have to reserve 25 per cent of their seats for children belonging to weaker sections and disadvantaged group following the mandate of the Right to Education (RTE) Act, the Delhi High Court has held.

 A bench comprising acting Chief Justice A K Sikri and Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw passed the order after a PIL (public interest litigation) was filed by an NGO apprehending that schools making admissions were not following the reservation criterion set by the RTE Act. The court had also sought clarification from the Department of Education (DoE) regarding reservation of seats in schools.

The bench further explained that the schools, which are imparting pre-school education, would have to provide 25 per cent reservation to children belonging to EWS and disadvantaged groups at the pre-school level.

The schools, which do not have pre-school education and are admitting children in class I, should provide 25 per cent reservation to children belonging to weaker section and dis-advantaged groups.The bench also pointed that the interpretation given by it was in consonance with the historic judgment the Supreme Court upholding the Constitutional validity of the RTE Act. The Act is to be applied from the academic year 2012-13.

NGO Social Jurist approached the court seeking direction for enforcement of certain facets of the RTE Act.

It referred to an order issued by Delhi government’s Director of Education (DOE) on May 18, which had deferred the direction to schools for filling vacant seats under the EWS and disadvantaged category in classes other than pre-school and pre-primary, till receipt of clarifications from the Union government’s Ministry of Human Resource Development.

The NGO contended such a deferment would delay the admission to other classes, till beyond the beginning of the academic session, and would lead to the seats remaining vacant for the current academic year.

The DOE submitted that the unaided schools were interpreting the provision of the Act to mean that they are obliged to admit students belonging to EWS and disadvantaged group at entry level only and not at any other level, even if they were making admission at any other levell.

The court clarified the position making it mandatory for the schools to follow the Act by directing them to admit students from that group at each level and not confine it to only at entry level. 

25% RTE quota for disadvantaged and EWS students



The Karnataka government has issued a notification defining the division of 25% RTE quota for the unprivileged children. The 25% RTE quota will be divided in 2 parts, disadvantaged groups and the EWS (economically weaker sections).
The disadvantaged group will comprise of 11 groups namely; ST, SC, category 1, 2(a), 2(b), 3(a), 3 (b), street children, orphans, children with special needs and HIV infected children. The students seeking admission under category 2(a), 2(b), 3(a) and 3(b) must have a family income below Rs 3.5 lakh per annum.
Children belonging to families with annual family income less than Rs 3.5 lakh which is also the condition for the creamy layer of backward class as defined by the social welfare department will come under EWS. The students seeking admission under EWS should not belong to any of the 11 disadvantaged groups.
Out of 25% seats, 7.5% seats have been assigned to SC and 1.5% for ST. Other 9 disadvantaged groups and EWS will share remaining 16% seats.
The notification of the social welfare department will decide the first 7 categories. The remaining will be as per the notification of the concerned department such as labour department.
The amount of Rs 11, 848 will be reimbursed by the government for each student admitted in class I. If the SC quota goes vacant then it can filled against ST students and vice-versa. If the 16% seats are vacant it will be filled by SC/ST and vice-versa.
The government is yet to take a call on how to fill the seats if they still remain vacant.

RTE is good, but govt needs to upgrade its schools, give support to private institutions


The RTE is a good initiative. We have a certain responsibility towards members of our society and we need to fulfill them. But it has to be implemented with proper infrastructure. There must be facilities in the school for such students so that they can be looked after. Separate teaching-learning facilities are needed in schools. Teachers also need to be conditioned accordingly, so that they don’t discriminate. And the students should not have the feeling that they come from a different (EWS) category. The government has taken a decision that these children should not be segregated. There are economical, psychological problems because they come from such heterogeneous backgrounds. But this will take time.
Would you buy the argument that if parents (general category) are ready to pay a little extra for the sake of their children, the government should not interfere with it?
Basically, every child in the country has the right to free and compulsory education, from the age of six to fourteen, rich or poor. It is thus the duty of the government to provide this free and compulsory education. So when the rich do not send their children to government schools because quality of education in (government) schools is not good, then they sacrifice their right to free and compulsory education and opt for private schools. They give up their rights and pay more fee than in government schools if the school is good and promises quality. At the same time, with the RTE, (EWS) students are also getting admission in the same schools alongside the general category students and free of cost. So who will pay the money? The government promises only
Rs 1,190 but the average expenditure on a DPS student per month is about Rs 5,000. Who will bear the cost? Again the burden will be on the parents of the rest of the 75 per cent children in a class. It’s like these parents are being punished, twice. One, for giving up their right to free education because the government failed to carry out its duty properly and, second, for bearing the burden of government’s promises in terms of 25 per cent reservation. There should be a solution to this. Either the government schools should upgraded or some support should be given to private schools.
Do you think that by having certain fixed criteria for providing admission to students, only those from a particular background get admitted? Does that hamper having a proper balance in the class?
There are no specifications in the EWS admissions. No criterion, except neighbourhood applies in this category. So under EWS, all types of students enter a class. Not particularly sibling or alumni. So in this 25 per cent there is no discrimination. But in the rest of the 75 per cent, school has the authority, that is given to it by the government, to formulate its admission policy with transparency. We abide by the rules. We have given weightage to all categories. Why should siblings not be considered? It becomes very difficult for parents to manage sending their children to two different schools.
Have parents under the EWS category raised any concerns?
There is a problem with the definition of the term. A peon, if he earns more than a lakh a year, cannot be placed under this category. While someone less suitable or needful may be. Question: What has been your experience with CCE?Answer: CCE is very good for the all-round development of the child. Thus, it serves the purpose of education. It caters to the physical, mental and social development of the child. From that perspective it’s very good. But implementation does not match up to the philosophy. It can vary from school to school and teacher to teacher. In our culture, one has to be very honest to be able to carry it out. The work load on the teachers has increased. Earlier it was the government’s job to conduct exams, check papers and declare results. But now it is all up to the teacher. The teacher is spending all his time in paper work.

EWS child denied admission to class 1


New Delhi, May 25, 2012, DHNS :
A child studying in Yuva Shakti Model School in Rohini Sector 3 has been denied admission to class 1 despite completing studies in UKG and LKG in the same school. Parents alleged that the school is forcing them to pay fees.

Kashish, a resident of Rohini, was admitted in 2009-10 academic session in LKG under the EWS category in this school. He was promoted to UKG in 2010-11, and was further promoted to class 1 in 2012-13. 

However, from April 1, 2012 the school asked the child not to come to school till his parents paid the entire fee. 

“We said that our child was studying under the EWS quota and we were not supposed to pay any fee. We tried to make them understand that we cannot afford such fees but the school authorities did not listen. 

“The child is still sitting at home as they are not allowing him to sit in class,” said Vijay Goel, the child’s father, who works in the organised sector. 

Since the school was turning a deaf ear to their problem, the parents approached the education officer of zone 13 in April and wrote a letter highlighting their issues. 

Ashok Agarwal, advocate and RTE campaigner, has written a letter to the directorate of education, asking the department to take action against the erring school. 

“It is submitted that the impugned action or inaction on the part of the school is arbitrary, discriminatory, unethical, unjust, improper, contrary to the provisions of Delhi School Education Act, 1973, violative of Articles 14, 15, 21, 21A and 38 of the Constitution, and also contrary to the provisions of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009,” stated the letter.

The school authorities have given a written reply to the education department, saying the child has studied for two full sessions and he will have to pay fees to continue with his schooling. 

“The student was given a seat in the school on sympathy grounds as the parents had financial constraints. In 2011-12 and 2012-13, the parents did not apply under the EWS quota in the school, and hence no record stands with the school regarding his admission under EWS category,” stated the letter given by the school.

Sunday, July 29, 2012

Over 50% RTE seats go abegging in Dakshina Kannada


MANGALORE: There are few takers for the 25% seats reserved for the economically weaker section (EWS) under the Right To Education Act, this academic year.
Though all unaided schools have reserved 25% seats in Class I for needy children, more than 50% of these seats remain vacant in Dakshina Kannada district, even after admissions are done with.
The department of public instruction had reserved 1,645 seats in 143 unaided schools in the district. However, the response from the EWS was lukewarm. A total of 825 applications were received for admission to Class I under the RTE category in seven blocks of the district. After scrutiny, 763 children were admitted, though only 46.38% of the allotted seats were filled.
A total of 409 seats in 33 schools were reserved in Mangalore taluk block, 306 seats in 21 schools in Mangalore city, 85 seats in nine schools in Sullia, 349 in 27 schools in Puttur, 311 in 33 schools in Bantwal and 107 seats in 10 schools in Moodabidri block.
Looked upon as the answer to society's lopsided progress, it appears that somewhere, there are lapses in the implementation of the RTE quota policy. Section 12(1)(c) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act mandates that unaided schools reserve 25% seats in Class I.
Lack of clarity and awareness of the provisions of the Act is said to be the reason for the poor response. The department is looking forward to implementing the scheme effectively from the next academic year. Activists working in the field of education say that poor people were not informed in advance about their privilege.

Friday, July 27, 2012

Poor kids score poorly in race for admissions



Source: Nishant Chhabra, DNA   |   Last Updated 05:22(27/07/12)
 

Jaipur: Even after the implementation of the Right to Education (RTE) Act, access to education has not become any easier for the students from the economically weaker sections (EWS) of the society.
Despite a lot of fuss and noise, the RTE Act, which mandates private schools to reserve 25 per cent of their seats at the entry level for students belonging to disadvantaged sections, is actually not fulfilling its main objective. Instead, a number of students who are poor are still away from getting admission in the schools.
When DNA queried and conducted a reality check in some the prominent schools of the city, a surprising fact came to light that the students admitted in the private schools are not from the economically weaker sections.
Many parents, who have admitted their wards to the schools rather belong to section that is comparatively an upper section than the EWS, while, children who hail from a low background are still not able to make a cut in these schools. The parents who can afford their child to get educated are availing the benefits of the RTE Act posing as from economically weaker section, by providing fake documents.
“Parents have been submitting fake certificates for the admission and the system that has been adopted is unable to provide education to the poor kids. There are lots of changes to be brought in the Act,” said, Dr Ashok Gupta, director, India International School.
The reason behind the lack of the accuracy in the admissions is not one but many. The income slab that is Rs2.5 lakh is very high, while the same income category in other states is Rs 1 lakh or so. Lack of awareness and confidence among the poor people is also one of the reasons that they hesitate to go and admit their wards.
“There are cases in which admissions have been taken on the basis of fake documents. We have also urged schools to ensure that admissions should be given to those who really deserve it. We have been requesting the state government to lower the income group, so that actually poor people can be included in the category,” said, Deepak Kalra, chairperson, State Commission for Protection of Children.

Saturday, June 9, 2012

Education free, but what about accessories?

BANGALORE: When Mohsina Begum, a mother of three, was told about the Right to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE), her joy knew no bounds. Already burdened with the responsibility of educating two children, Mohsina was finding it difficult to get her third child admitted in a school. 

"I was paying the tuition fee for two children and was left with no money to invest in my third child. Then I was told about RTE and free education to Economically Weaker Section (EWS)," says Mohsina, who appears to have hit a roadblock despite RTE being in place. "I was elated that my child can study now as education is free. I went to the New Citizen School in Kushalnagar and filled up the application form. Everything was going well, till yesterday, when the school demanded Rs 3,705 for the textbooks and the school uniform. I have hit a roadblock once again. The maximum that I can arrange for right now is Rs 1,000. If the school does not agree, I will have to pull my child out,'' says Mohsina. 

There are many like Mohsina, who are disappointed. According to Mohsina, eight families went ahead with the process of admission under the Act, but are now planning to give up, looking at the huge sum being asked for textbooks and uniforms. "Most of the schools are charging exorbitant amount for textbooks and school uniforms. 

Some say, they are planning to get imported material to be stitched, while some claim that since they have placed the orders a year ago, they can't reduce the charges. Whatever the reason, many poor families are all set to opt out," says Yasir Mohammed, a social worker, who has been facilitating the admissions under RTE. 

WHAT SCHOOLS SAY 

In the absence of guidelines on the maximum amount that can be charged for textbooks and uniforms from poor children, schools have fixed different amounts. Some are charging for the computer sessions and smart classes as well. 

"We are charging Rs 2,000, excluding textbooks and stationery. We are already running on very minimum charges and cannot dip beyond this point. The amount should be anywhere near Rs 3,000, including textbooks. We will not be able to help poor children here," says Salma Khatoon, principal, Excellent School. Many schools say that although they are charging money foraccessories, parents are fee to go out and buy on their own. "We are charging around Rs 2,000. But we are also giving parents the option of purchasing from outside," says Ashraf Ulla Khan, principal, New Citizen School in Khushalnagar.


http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bangalore/Education-free-but-what-about-accessories/articleshow/13945861.cms

Monday, June 4, 2012

Problems of School Dropouts



Dr. M. C. Jain
M.A. Ph.D. (Psychology)
Ex-Associate Professor, NCERT

All the developing countries are facing crises in their educational system with problem of school dropouts at the school level in general and primary level in particular. To combat this problem which is common in almost all such countries steps have been initiated by these countries with varying degrees of success.
The principle that liberal education is the right of every individual is comparatively of recent origin. Even elementary liberal education was confined to a small class of upper social strata (about 1 to 5% of the children in the age group 5-15), mostly boys. For the remaining children, vocational education learnt in a non-formal manner through apprenticeship or active participation was considered adequate. At the beginning of the 20th Century therefore, there were innumerable small elementary schools in almost all towns and villages, but they enrolled only between 1 to 5% of the children of school going and the percentage of literacy among the adults was only about 3% and that too confined to men alone. The enlightened educated Indians like Dada Bhai Nauroji, Gopal Krishna Gokhale saw the provision of universal liberal education in the advanced countries of the West and demanded compulsory education of four years for all children. The compulsory education act was passed providing 4 to 5 years of liberal education to all children in different states during 1918-1931.
When the country became free , the framers of our Constitution knew that society based on freedom, equality , justice and dignity of the individual cannot be created without literate and educated citizens. Accordingly in Article 45 they directed that the state should strive to provide free and compulsory education to all children till they attain the age of 14 years. Since independence, there has been an impressive expansion of education at Primary, Secondary and Higher levels in India. This stands in sharp contrast to the chronic problems of (a) quality and equality of opportunity both at school and college levels (b) wastage and stagnation at all levels, particularly at the primary level and (c) unemployment of the educated.
In fact, the problem of school dropouts in our educational system has received much attention during the last forty years. It has been discussed thoroughly at national level and yet there have not been any action programme for the reduction of this evil. This problem has three aspects-
1. The first is that school dropout is the result of weak and defective educational system.
2. The second aspect is to bring about changes in the educational system to suit the life and needs of pupil who are entering the school for the first time.
3. The third is that in every given situation in an educational institution and even at the existing level of facilities.
There are four essential requirement of every child i.e. food, shelter, clothing and education. The Indian Constitution provides for free, compulsory and universal primary education for every child till the age of 14 years. Since India became independent, great efforts have been made in this direction. However, due to the magnitude of the work and great resources involved the constitutional obligation has not been fulfilled so far. There may be a large number of reasons for our failures. Some of the well known and commonly talked about are sudden and large increase in population , lack of resources, our single point of entry in elementary education , non-involvement of the pupil, slackening of efforts on the part of the Government and giving low priority to education in their plans. Some of the basic reasons which are directly connected and responsible for these burning problems are poverty, taking up odd jobs to supplement income, involvement of children in domestic work, educational background, caste, occupation , indifference of parents, continued presence in one class for more than one year, poor quality of teaching, lack of proper environment at home, education system not according to the needs of society, faulty admission policy, proper school environment, death of parents, irregular attendance, undernourishment of the pupils, heterogeneity in age in the composition students in a classroom situation, emotional problems of the pupils, social maladjustment of pupils, mental retardation and so on. Apart from this some other causes like physical defects, parent’s attitude towards school, teacher’s education, family atmosphere, institutional factors like heavy syllabus, lack of co-curricular activities etc. are directly responsible for this burning problem.
In short, the element of compulsory and free education cannot be a source of satisfaction unless the compulsory system leads to a higher percentage of enrolment and attendance and better flow of promotion from class to class so that literary is reached by much larger number of scholars.