Sunday, October 7, 2012

Complaint against the CPIO, Central Vigilance Commission


To,
The Commissioner of Police,
Delhi Police Head Quarter,
I.P. Estate, New Delhi.

Subject: Complaint against the CPIO, Central Vigilance Commission, regarding Non-Compliance or Defiance of orders of Hon’ble Central Information Commission by (CPIO) a government public servant is a serious matter and CPIO have thus also committed offences punishable under Sections 166,176, 177, 186, 187 and 188 of the Indian Penal Code.

Respected Sir,

As I am aggrieved by Non-Compliance or Defiance of order/decision of this Hon’ble Central Information Commission by Public Information Officer [PIO], I want hereby register this complaint with you for your kind Effective action for compliance of decision/orders. (CIC’s Order Copy attached).

I had sought information as per enclosed RTI application dated01-12-2010 The CPIO provided completely irrelevant and wrong information. I filed first appeal 14-01-2011. In the meantime, I received a letter from the CPIO. I am not satisfied with the reply of the FAA; I filed second appeal in the Central Information Commission on  25/02/2011, CIC sent me a letter to come for a hearing on 25/04/2012, after hearing, CIC gave a decision/order on 25/04/2012, CIC ordered that information be provided to the Appellant within 10 days. However, even after nearly six months I did not get any response from the CPIO, Central Vigilance Commission, which prompted me to register a case with the Delhi Police for non-compliance or Defiance of order of the CIC.

Despite order of Hon’ble Sh. Satyananda Mishra, Chief Information Commissioner, PIO has not provided required information within the time stipulated in the decision i. e. by 25/04/2012. Non-Compliance or Defiance of order of Hon’ble Central Information Commission by (CPIO) a government public servant is a serious matter and CPIO have thus also committed offences punishable under Sections 166,176, 177, 186, 187 and 188 of the Indian Penal Code.

I therefore request to you kindly lodge my FIR against errant the CPIO, Central Vigilance Commission, Satarkta Bhawan, G.P.O. Complex, Block-A, INA, New Delhi-110023.

I shall be highly thankful to you for this act of justice.

Thanking you,

Sincerely,


(Mahatam Singh),
C-158, Jawala Puri,Camp No.-4,
Sunder Vihar, New Delhi-87
Mob.: 9211801521

Thursday, October 4, 2012

AUTHORITY LETTER for RTI


AUTHORITY LETTER for RTI


I, ______________s/o ______________ aged _____ years and residing at ______________ hereby authorize Shri ____________ s/o ____________ aged _____ years and residing at _____________ and who signs as ___________________ to do all or any of following acts as my authorized representative in the matter of The Right to Information Act 2005:

1. To file applications for seeking information.

2. To file first appeals or second appeals or complaints with first appellate authorities and/or State Information Commissions or Central Information Commission

3. To attend hearings before first appellate authorities and/or State Information Commissions or Central Information Commission and to participate therein,

4. To address suitable communications to various authorities.

5. To make payment of other charges under the said Act for information.

6. To do all other acts incidental to above acts.

Acts done under this authority letter will be binding on me, as if it were done by me.

This authority is valid till ________[date].

Signed on [date] ___________at ____________[Place]

Signature: ___________________

Witness 1: Name ___________ Address __________ Signature__________ 


Witness 2: Name ___________ Address __________ Signature__________

[This can be executed on plaint paper. However to be on safer side, this authority letter may be executed on Rs.100 stamp paper and can be notarized after deleting witnesses. Please make changes to suit your case] 

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Complaint against dispensary pharmacist for refused prescribed cough syrup.


To, 

The Director/ IMO, 

ESIC Medical dispensary, 

Jawala Puri, New Delhi-110087. 

Subject : Complaint against dispensary pharmacist for refused prescribed cough syrup.

Dear Sir/ Madam,

This is to bring into kind your notice that denied prescribed medicines and unethical behavior by the Pharmacist of ESIC dispensary which is located in Jawala Puri. I want to file a complaint against him

My Mother by name Smt. Premwati was went to ESIC Jawala Puri dispensary for check up due to ill health/severe cough on 26-09-2012. The Doctor is checked & prescribes some medicine & syrup on a treatment slip. My mother went to pharmacy counter for prescribes medicines, but Pharmacist gives some tablets & denied for cough syrup & told her that doctor not prescribes cough syrup. My mother again meets to doctor and ask him for cough syrup. The doctor reply to my mother “I WROTE COUGH SYRUP” you go again & demand to pharmacist for cough syrup after then he gives her.

I am very much depressed on this irresponsible behavior of the ESIC dispensary pharmacist. I have seen several times Pharmacist's attitude this common scenario there. I don't know what effect will my complaint take but still I am making it because things really need to change. He has no sense how to talk with female patients & old age people. Do you think, Employees are paying for that to fooling his/ her old age father and mother by ESIC employees?

So I request you to kindly take proper action against the ESIC dispensary pharmacist as they are only be fooling the Public even in such a social and noble profession of healthcare industry.

I shall be highly thankful to you for this act of justice.

Thanking you,

Sincerely,

(Brij Mohan Singh)
ESIC Card No. 2013333190,
B-618, Jawala Puri, New Delhi-87.

Copy to:-
Gyan Lakshay (NGO) Delhi

Friday, September 21, 2012

INDIA ADOPTING US ECONOMIC POLICIES TO SLAUGHTER MAIN STREET

Dave Makkar - 21 Sep, 2012
India has blindly adopted the American Economic Policies, without taking into account America a one time Super Power is barely crawling and can’t even walk under the load of these Anti-common people and Pro 1% Rich policies. 

Today America has 50 mil people on Food Stamps, 20 mil unemployed, 30 mil under-employed, 16 mil children facing hunger, 1.5 mil homeless youth and 70 mil with no health insurance. Above all $16 Trillion external debts, $4 Trillion state government debt and $175 Trillion in unfunded liabilities. Today if you sell every American’s assets the total that can be realized is $78 trillion!

DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH IN AMERICA UNDER PRO RICH ECONOMIC POLICIES

Bottom 50% owns 2.5% of the Nations Assets, 40% owns 26%, Assets, 9% owns 37.8% assets and top 1% owns 33.7%. In other words top 10% owns 41.5% of US assets.

The six heirs to the Walmart fortune are worth as much as nearly half of all American households. The Walton family was worth $89.5 billion in 2010, the same as the bottom 41.5 percent of U.S. families combined, according to Josh Bivens of the Economic Policy Institute. That's 48.8 million American households in total.

SHRINKING WORKERS WAGES & RISING CEO SALARIES
Workers wages in USA has Dropped 14.4% SINCE 1945 and on the other hand CEO salaries has gone up by 1400% in the same period.

30% employed in private sector of America are making less than $10/hour in other words not making “LIVING WAGES”. The National Minimum wage has lost 30 percent of its purchasing power since 1968 as per NFLP report.

A TYPICAL WALLMART STORE EMPLOYS 350 PEOPLE 

Out of that 320 are min. wage earners or $10/hr earner. 

10 are managers and 20 are Supervisors. 

98% of the stuff sold in Walmart is Made in China. 

The minimum wage earners in America are not making the "Living Wages" that can take care of their families. That is the reason they are on Food Stamps and other welfare schemes run by Federal & state governments. 

In America 30% of the jobs in Private Sector are paying $10/hr that can not provide sustainability to a family. So these earners are not making "Living Wages"; they need assistance to survive.

If India wants to give a bost to Chinese Economy & bost in the number of employed people on Welfare THEN THEY SHOULD WELCOME WALMART & ITS COUNTERPART FROM AROUND THE WORLD.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Bangalore: Irked by RTE school cuts hair of poor students



Dailybhaskar.com | Jul 18, 2012, 11:05AM IST
Bangalore: In a shocking incident came to light on Tuesday, a private school here allegedly cut off tufts of hair on top of the heads of four children who were admitted there under the Right to Education (RTE) quota. This was done to reportedly distinguish these children, admitted under the RTE quota, from other students.
As per a report published in The Hindu, the parents of the children, admitted in standard I in the school at Nandini Layout, allege students admitted under the RTE quota are made to stand separately during the assembly and their lunch boxes are checked before they enter their class. They allege that the names of their wards have not been entered in the attendance register. The school reportedly makes them sit in the back benches and they are not given any homework.
Incidentally, this school is part of the Karnataka Unaided School Managements’ Association (KUSMA) that is vehemently opposed to implementation of the RTE quota of 25 percent in city schools. Several schools under KUSMA, including this one, remained closed for the second day as part of the association’s weeklong protest against implementation of the RTE.

Has ‘ambitious’ RTE Act failed? No admission for EWS’ students


DNA | Sep 17, 2012, 04:59AM IST
Ahmedabad: The ambitious initiative of the Union government to revolutionise the education system through the Right to Education (RTE) Act seems to be a pipe dream as schools in city have found loopholes in the act to avoid inducting children from economically weaker section (EWS).
While many schools claim that there is lack of awareness about RTE among the EWS, others blame it on the government for not providing information to the deserving people. “There is no awareness among people about the act (RTE). The government should make even the act of providing information about the act official,” said Manan Choksi, managing director, Udgam School.
Citing the provisions, HB Kapadia School which is a minority institution said that it is exempted from the act. The RTE says that schools registered as minority institutions don’t fall within the purview of the act.
“Since our school is registered as a minority institution, the RTE is not applicable to us,” was the reply of Muktak Kapadia, trustee of HB Kapadia School. However, some schools have a different story to tell. Schools claim that they are open to admissions for poor students, but haven’t received any applications. “We are open to take students under RTE but have not received any application so far. The government has not clarified anything about the funding of RTE students,” said Jayshree Joshi, principal of Satwa Vikas School. Another city school CN Vidyalaya, which has recently introduced English medium also cites similar reasons behind its inability to induct children from the weaker sections. Lack of awareness is not the only hindrance. Raising doubts about how EWS students will gel with regular students, principal of Anand Niketan school, Nashy Chauhan, said, “It will be difficult for EWS students to cope with the regular ones when they join in class 1 as the regular students would have got a different exposure in kindergarten.”
In addition, residential schools are also exempted from RTE purview. “Satwa Vikas comes partly under residential school. So, we are not under obligation to take students under RTE,” said an official of Satwa Vikas School.
Meanwhile, Kendriya Vidyalaya where RTE has been implemented doesn’t have a school monitoring committee (SMC) to monitor the process of act’s implementation. It is a violation of RTE norms whereby it is necessary for schools to have SMC which is supposed to report to the state government about the status of RTE. “The students of EWS in our school buy uniforms, books and other stationeries, they should provide us the bill which the school will later reimburse,” said Rohit Das Kumar, principal of the school.
However, some schools in the city have started taking in students under the act. St Kabir School has been implementing the act for the last three years. “We do not expect any monetary assistance from the government. The school bears the fee and other requirements of RTE students on its own,” Rashmi Trivedi, principal of St Kabir School said. Another prominent city school, Riverside has also implemented the act since its inception.