Thursday, September 27, 2012

Complaint against dispensary pharmacist for refused prescribed cough syrup.


To, 

The Director/ IMO, 

ESIC Medical dispensary, 

Jawala Puri, New Delhi-110087. 

Subject : Complaint against dispensary pharmacist for refused prescribed cough syrup.

Dear Sir/ Madam,

This is to bring into kind your notice that denied prescribed medicines and unethical behavior by the Pharmacist of ESIC dispensary which is located in Jawala Puri. I want to file a complaint against him

My Mother by name Smt. Premwati was went to ESIC Jawala Puri dispensary for check up due to ill health/severe cough on 26-09-2012. The Doctor is checked & prescribes some medicine & syrup on a treatment slip. My mother went to pharmacy counter for prescribes medicines, but Pharmacist gives some tablets & denied for cough syrup & told her that doctor not prescribes cough syrup. My mother again meets to doctor and ask him for cough syrup. The doctor reply to my mother “I WROTE COUGH SYRUP” you go again & demand to pharmacist for cough syrup after then he gives her.

I am very much depressed on this irresponsible behavior of the ESIC dispensary pharmacist. I have seen several times Pharmacist's attitude this common scenario there. I don't know what effect will my complaint take but still I am making it because things really need to change. He has no sense how to talk with female patients & old age people. Do you think, Employees are paying for that to fooling his/ her old age father and mother by ESIC employees?

So I request you to kindly take proper action against the ESIC dispensary pharmacist as they are only be fooling the Public even in such a social and noble profession of healthcare industry.

I shall be highly thankful to you for this act of justice.

Thanking you,

Sincerely,

(Brij Mohan Singh)
ESIC Card No. 2013333190,
B-618, Jawala Puri, New Delhi-87.

Copy to:-
Gyan Lakshay (NGO) Delhi

Friday, September 21, 2012

INDIA ADOPTING US ECONOMIC POLICIES TO SLAUGHTER MAIN STREET

Dave Makkar - 21 Sep, 2012
India has blindly adopted the American Economic Policies, without taking into account America a one time Super Power is barely crawling and can’t even walk under the load of these Anti-common people and Pro 1% Rich policies. 

Today America has 50 mil people on Food Stamps, 20 mil unemployed, 30 mil under-employed, 16 mil children facing hunger, 1.5 mil homeless youth and 70 mil with no health insurance. Above all $16 Trillion external debts, $4 Trillion state government debt and $175 Trillion in unfunded liabilities. Today if you sell every American’s assets the total that can be realized is $78 trillion!

DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH IN AMERICA UNDER PRO RICH ECONOMIC POLICIES

Bottom 50% owns 2.5% of the Nations Assets, 40% owns 26%, Assets, 9% owns 37.8% assets and top 1% owns 33.7%. In other words top 10% owns 41.5% of US assets.

The six heirs to the Walmart fortune are worth as much as nearly half of all American households. The Walton family was worth $89.5 billion in 2010, the same as the bottom 41.5 percent of U.S. families combined, according to Josh Bivens of the Economic Policy Institute. That's 48.8 million American households in total.

SHRINKING WORKERS WAGES & RISING CEO SALARIES
Workers wages in USA has Dropped 14.4% SINCE 1945 and on the other hand CEO salaries has gone up by 1400% in the same period.

30% employed in private sector of America are making less than $10/hour in other words not making “LIVING WAGES”. The National Minimum wage has lost 30 percent of its purchasing power since 1968 as per NFLP report.

A TYPICAL WALLMART STORE EMPLOYS 350 PEOPLE 

Out of that 320 are min. wage earners or $10/hr earner. 

10 are managers and 20 are Supervisors. 

98% of the stuff sold in Walmart is Made in China. 

The minimum wage earners in America are not making the "Living Wages" that can take care of their families. That is the reason they are on Food Stamps and other welfare schemes run by Federal & state governments. 

In America 30% of the jobs in Private Sector are paying $10/hr that can not provide sustainability to a family. So these earners are not making "Living Wages"; they need assistance to survive.

If India wants to give a bost to Chinese Economy & bost in the number of employed people on Welfare THEN THEY SHOULD WELCOME WALMART & ITS COUNTERPART FROM AROUND THE WORLD.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Bangalore: Irked by RTE school cuts hair of poor students



Dailybhaskar.com | Jul 18, 2012, 11:05AM IST
Bangalore: In a shocking incident came to light on Tuesday, a private school here allegedly cut off tufts of hair on top of the heads of four children who were admitted there under the Right to Education (RTE) quota. This was done to reportedly distinguish these children, admitted under the RTE quota, from other students.
As per a report published in The Hindu, the parents of the children, admitted in standard I in the school at Nandini Layout, allege students admitted under the RTE quota are made to stand separately during the assembly and their lunch boxes are checked before they enter their class. They allege that the names of their wards have not been entered in the attendance register. The school reportedly makes them sit in the back benches and they are not given any homework.
Incidentally, this school is part of the Karnataka Unaided School Managements’ Association (KUSMA) that is vehemently opposed to implementation of the RTE quota of 25 percent in city schools. Several schools under KUSMA, including this one, remained closed for the second day as part of the association’s weeklong protest against implementation of the RTE.

Has ‘ambitious’ RTE Act failed? No admission for EWS’ students


DNA | Sep 17, 2012, 04:59AM IST
Ahmedabad: The ambitious initiative of the Union government to revolutionise the education system through the Right to Education (RTE) Act seems to be a pipe dream as schools in city have found loopholes in the act to avoid inducting children from economically weaker section (EWS).
While many schools claim that there is lack of awareness about RTE among the EWS, others blame it on the government for not providing information to the deserving people. “There is no awareness among people about the act (RTE). The government should make even the act of providing information about the act official,” said Manan Choksi, managing director, Udgam School.
Citing the provisions, HB Kapadia School which is a minority institution said that it is exempted from the act. The RTE says that schools registered as minority institutions don’t fall within the purview of the act.
“Since our school is registered as a minority institution, the RTE is not applicable to us,” was the reply of Muktak Kapadia, trustee of HB Kapadia School. However, some schools have a different story to tell. Schools claim that they are open to admissions for poor students, but haven’t received any applications. “We are open to take students under RTE but have not received any application so far. The government has not clarified anything about the funding of RTE students,” said Jayshree Joshi, principal of Satwa Vikas School. Another city school CN Vidyalaya, which has recently introduced English medium also cites similar reasons behind its inability to induct children from the weaker sections. Lack of awareness is not the only hindrance. Raising doubts about how EWS students will gel with regular students, principal of Anand Niketan school, Nashy Chauhan, said, “It will be difficult for EWS students to cope with the regular ones when they join in class 1 as the regular students would have got a different exposure in kindergarten.”
In addition, residential schools are also exempted from RTE purview. “Satwa Vikas comes partly under residential school. So, we are not under obligation to take students under RTE,” said an official of Satwa Vikas School.
Meanwhile, Kendriya Vidyalaya where RTE has been implemented doesn’t have a school monitoring committee (SMC) to monitor the process of act’s implementation. It is a violation of RTE norms whereby it is necessary for schools to have SMC which is supposed to report to the state government about the status of RTE. “The students of EWS in our school buy uniforms, books and other stationeries, they should provide us the bill which the school will later reimburse,” said Rohit Das Kumar, principal of the school.
However, some schools in the city have started taking in students under the act. St Kabir School has been implementing the act for the last three years. “We do not expect any monetary assistance from the government. The school bears the fee and other requirements of RTE students on its own,” Rashmi Trivedi, principal of St Kabir School said. Another prominent city school, Riverside has also implemented the act since its inception.

Friday, September 14, 2012

Decision No. CIC/WB/A/2008/01401/LS


CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Room No. 308, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066
File No.CIC/WB/A/2008/01401/LS
Govind Prasad Aggarwal VS DDA
Dated : 10.3.2010
This is in continuation of this Commission’s proceedings dated
13.3.2009, 13.9.2009 & 12.1.2010 in the above cited matter.  As scheduled,
the matter is called for hearing today dated 11.3.2010.  Appellant Shri
Govind Prasad Agagrwal is present along with his son Shri Sanjeev
Aggarwal.  Shri R.L. Punyani, Dy. Director (MIG) (H); Shri H.C. Kaushik,
Sr AO & Shri S.N. Vats, Asstt Director (MIG) (H) are also present.  The
matter in hand, raises the following two important issues :-
(i) Non-intimation of details of costing in respect of flat No 259, LIG,
Pocket-V, Phase-II, Mayur Vihar to the appellant; &
(ii) Not supplying requested information in the prescribed period of 30
days.
2. I will now take these issues one by one.  As regards issue No (i), it
is the submission of the appellant that DDA has miscalculated the cost of
the flat in violation of the judgment dated 3.8.2007 of the Hon’ble Delhi
High Court in CONT (CAS(C)1236 of 2006 (G.P. Aggarwal Vs DDA).
On the other hand, Shri Kaushik forcefully submits that the costing has
been done in accordance with the judgment of the Delhi High Court with
the approval of the competent authority.  It is not for the Commission to go
into the merits of the calculation of cost made by DDA.  It would suffice if
the DDA provides the details of costing to the appellant.  The DDA
officers have shown me their internal notings in which the details has been
worked out but this has not been communicated to the appellant.  In view
of this, Shri R.L. Punyani, Dy Director (MIG) (H), is hereby directed to
communicate the details of costing to the appellant in 04 weeks time.  
3. As regards, Issue No (ii), it is undisputed that the appellant had filed
RTI application on 29.2.2008.   The para-wise information was provided to
him by Dy Director (MIG) (H) vide letter dated  28.7.2008.  Needless to
say, u/s 6 (1) of the RTI Act, information is required to be provided in 30
days time.  In other words, the information should have been provided by
the appellant by the end of March,  2008.  However, there was delay of
about 04 months.  Dy Director (MIG) (H) has drawn my  attention to the
letter dated 29.4.2008 of Shr B.B. Kundal, the then Director (H) II vide
which the appellant was informed that this matter was to be dealt with in
MIG section.  It is also to be noted that the Commission had issued notice
to Smt Neelam Chaddha, Director (H) II and she had filed a response vide
letter dated 20.4.2009 which is reproduced below :-
“Please refer to your Show Cause Notice issued vide File No
CIC/WB/A/2008/01401/LS dated 27.11.2009 on the above noted
subject.  In this regard, it is submitted that the undersigned joined as Director (Housing)-II w.e.f. 4.6.2008, whereas, the RTI application
of Shri Gobind Prasad Aggarwal dated 29.2.2008 received vide ID
No 1115 dated 29.2.2009 was prior to my posting in the Housing
Deptt.
It is further submitted that the  aforesaid application was initially
forwarded by Shri B.B. Kundal, the then PIO/Director (Housing)-II,
DDA to Shri Desh Raj Arora, Dy Director (LIG)-H vide his even
No 591 dated 14.3.2008 for furnishing suitable information.  In
response to abvoe, the Asstt Director (LIG)-H vide his note dated
1.4.2008 (on the  body this office letter  dated 14.3.2008 informed
that case relates to MIG (Housign) Branch.  As such, vide this office
letter of even No 808 dated 7.4.2008, the applicant was informed
accordingly and his RTI application was transferred to Dy Director
(MIG)-H.
Further, the applicant filed the appeal application dated 9.6.2008.
The AA(H)/Commissioner  (H) passed order No
488/RTI/AA(H)/ID-1115/DH-II/PIO/1606 dated 3.7.2008 on the
aforesaid application and immediately the same was forwarded to
Dy Director (MIG)-H vide this office letter of even No 1770 dated
4.7.2008.  In response to above, Dy Director (MIG)-H vide her letter
dated 28.7.2008 submitted the para-wise information to RTI
application dated 29.2.2008 as well as appeal application dated
9.6.2008 and thereafter, the same was provided to the appellant vide
this office letter of even No. 2040 dated 30.7.2008.  Therefore, there
is no delay on the part of undersigned.
It is also pertinent to mention  here that Smt Krishna Mehta, Dy
Director (MIG)-H was also posted in MIG (Housing) branch w.e.f.
10.7.2009.
In the light of above, you are requested to withdraw the aforesaid
notice since there is no delay on the part of PIO/Director (Housing)-
II/the undersigned as well as Dy Director (MIG)-H, Smt Krishna
Mehta.”
4. From her letter, it is clear that this matter has  passed through the
hands of several officials, and, therefore, it is difficult to determine
individual responsibility for the purposes of imposition of penalty u/s
section 20 (1) of the RTI Act.  The fact, however, remains that there has
been delay of 04 months in responding to the RTI application.  The DDA
officers present before the Commission are heard on this issue.  They
vehemently oppose payment of compensation to the appellant on the
ground that the matter in hand involved several departments/offices of the
DDA, particularly the Accounts Department for sending an conclusive
response to the appellant, and this, naturally took time.  They also plead
that delay was not deliberate was inherent in the situation..  The
explanation given by the DDA officers is not found to be satisfactory.  
5. The appellant pleads that this  has caused him detriments and he
requests for compensation u/s 19 (8) (b) of the RTI Act.  As mentioned
herein above, delay of 04 months has occurred in supply of information to the appellant and thereby the appellant has suffered detriment in terms of
section 19 (8) (b) of the RTI Act.  On a thoughtful consideration of the
matter, we are of the opinion that the ends of justice will be met if
compensation of Rs 15000/- is paid to the appellant.  A copy of this order
may be sent to Smt Asma Manjar, Commissioner (H), DDA,  with the
direction to pay compensation of  Rs 15000/-  to Shri Goving Prasad
Aggarwal, R/o House No 2686, HBC  Colony, Sector-03, Faridabad,
Haryana by Demand Draft/Cheque.
6. The order of the Commission may  be complied with in 04 weeks
time.
7. With this, the matter stands closed at the Commission’s end.
Sd/-
(M.L. Sharma)
Central Information Commissioner
Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be
supplied against application and payment of the charges, prescribed under
the Act, to the CPIO of this Commission.
(K.L. Das)
Assistant Registrar
Address of parties :-
1. Smt Asma Manjar
 Commissioner (H),
 Delhi Development Authority,
 INA, Vikas Sadan,
 New Delhi-110023
2. Shri R.L. Punyani
Dy Director, MIG (H),
 Delhi Development Authority,
 INA, Vikas Sadan,
 New Delhi-110023
3. Shri Govind Prasad Aggarwal
 R/o House No 2686,
 HBC Colony, Sector-03,
 Faridabad, Haryana.

Delhi-based lawyer claims he's being harassed by the police for targeting unauthorised encroachment on Yamuna river-bed in Jamia Nagar area


Looking at the state it is in now, some believe it's already too late to save the Yamuna. But Jagbir Singh is not giving up. The 48-year-old lawyer has been actively involved with the Save the Yamuna campaign for the past 15 years. 

He played a key role to get an order from the High Court to stop illegal constructions on the river-bed. But now, Singh says he is facing trouble from the cops for filing Right to Information (RTI) pleas and Public Interest Litigations (PILs) against them.

"In the year 1993, the Delhi High Court ordered the removal of unauthorised encroachment from the river-bed but the authorities didn't take any action. Then I filed a writ petition in 1996 and the court ordered Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the Delhi police to ensure that there will not be any construction within 300 metres of the river. 

Justice JK Mehar and Justice Usha Mehra had separately ordered the DDA and the cops to ensure that the orders were complied with. The court had also asked for the land around the river-bed to be surveyed on a regular basis. But in October last year I saw that construction was going on the river-bed in Jamia Nagar area and I complained to the court regarding the same on October 6. I also reported  the matter to the Additional CP of the area. I filed an RTI plea to find out about the action taken by cops," Jagbir Singh told MiD DAY.

But his earnestness only invited trouble. Singh claims the Station House Officer (SHO) of Jamia Nagar, Satbeer Dagar, allegedly threatened him of dire consequences if he pursued the matter any further. "Last October, the Jamia SHO asked me not to file any complaints regarding the matter but I ignored. On February 7 at around 7pm I received a call from the SHO who started abusing me. He said that if I continued with my efforts against them, he would implicate me in false cases. I immediately called the PCR and complained about the SHO. I went to the senior police officers of the area on February 8," he said.

Singh says he didn't have an easy time. "The Additional Commissioner of Police (southeast) VS Chahal was busy that day, so I met the Additional DCP and complained about the Satbeer Dagar. Next day I met the Additional Commissioner but he forwarded the local matter to local vigilance department. I protested and said that the SHO was working under the very people who would investigate the case. So the matter must be forwarded to the vigilance headquarters or crime branch," Singh added.

Singh was asked to wait till the cops completed their inquiry. But the complainant didn't receive a positive response from the police. So he went to meet Delhi Police Commissioner BK Gupta.
"On February 28 I went to meet the Commissioner of Police. I was the fourth person waiting for him that day but when my turn came Gupta left his office to attend some meeting. Then I again went to meet him on March 1. I told him the whole situation but he didn't give me a proper hearing and said that the matter is in court. I tried to explain him that the matter in court is about illegal constructions and I was complaining about the threats from the SHO.
But he hardly paid any attention. Actually it's very clear by the order of the last Commissioner of Police YS Dadwal that the SHO of the area will be responsible for any such encroachment. But no one was ready to accept my point that Dagar is threatening me because he will be in trouble if my allegations are proved in court," Singh added.
Jagbir Singh filed an RTI on March 21 to find out about the action taken by cops after his complaints against the Jamia Nagar SHO.

When MiD DAY contacted them cops refused to comment on the issue saying it was related to a court's order. "The matter is investigated by the concerned department. We can't say anything more as the case is already in court," said a police officer.
Experts say there can be no leeway as far as the issue of river-bed encroachment is concerned. "Rivers are basically resource of water and climate change and excessive melting is happening. Water crisis is the biggest problem we are facing. River-bed should be untouched so discharge of water can happen unhindered. The illegal construction can cause huge floods. Pakistan faced floods last year just because of just this reason. We need to learn more lessons from such situations," said Sanjay Vashisht, Director, South Asia, Climate Action Network (CAN).

CIC's RTI order on pvt schools stayed


Abhinav Garg, TNN Sep 24, 2011, 06.09am IST
NEW DELHI: Delhi high court on Friday decided to examine if the private unaided schools in the capital fall under the RTI Act and can be termed a "public authority" .
Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw admitted a petition filed by one of the Delhi Public Schools challenging a Central Information Commission ruling that such schools are "public authority" as defined by the RTI Act and stayed the CIC order.
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/images/pixel.gif
HC also made 'Delhi Abhibhavak Mahasangh' — an association of parents — a party to the case and asked all stakeholders , including the education directorate, to respond to the petition filed by DPS Rohini through its Principal Rita Sen.
Appearing for the school, advocate Punit Mittal argued the school is neither directly nor indirectly funded by the government. He also opposed CIC's conclusion that land was allotted to the school in 1997 at a concessional rate and said the CIC ruling is bad in law. After taking into account the arguments , HC has now posted the case for December.
Earlier this year, the CIC had declared DPS comes under the ambit of RTI Act as it received substantial funding from the government in the form of subsidized land. The transparency panel said Delhi Public School, Rohini, is a public authority within the ambit of the RTI Act as it is controlled by different agencies under the Delhi administration like DDA and Directorate of Education.
The case relates to an RTI applicant Mohit Goel who sought information from DPS, Rohini, on admission procedures and admissions made under the policy framework specified by the Department of Education for 2010-11 for preschool.
The school refused to give any information saying the RTI Act is not applicable on it as it is a private unaided organization and also cited clause of exemption of personal and private information. Before the Commission, Goel challenged the reasons put forth by the school saying over 10,000sqm of land has been allotted to the school by DDA at a nominal rent of Rs 10 per annum.

Is DDA above the law of this country? Mockery of RTI Act.

The Chief Information Commissioner,  
Central Information Commission (CIC),New Delhi
Sub:    Is DDA above the law of this country?  Mockery of RTI Act.
Respected Sir,
I would like to invite your kind attention towards the unsavory and thus challengeable manner, through which RTI Act is being distorted by DDA officials.
Even if the requisite RTI fee is not paid and a formal request is not made, a complaint/ letter forwarded from other departments (instant example: from Hon’ble LG office) for an action and report back, is treated as RTI application by ‘efficient DDA officials’. Most shocking, this letter has the receiving stamps and remarks of almost all higher DDA officials/ offices including VC & Principal Commissioner – Secretary. 
1.          Letter no. F.11(1517)08/RTI/DDA/406 dated 25.02.2009 from Sr. R.O. (RTI) informing me about my RTI application being forwarded to Dy.Director (LSB)Rohini, DDA. 
2.          Letter no. F.11(1517)09/RTI/DDA/465 dated 03.03.2009 from Sr. R.O. (RTI) informing me about my RTI application being forwarded to Director (RL)-DDA, Dy. Director (GH), DDA, Dy.Director (LSB)-Rohini, DDA and Dy. Director (CL)-DDA.
 
3.          Letter no. F-100(02)2009/CL/RTI/82/968 dated 17.03.3009 from Dy. Director (CL)-DDA informing me about the transferring his responsibilities on Dy. Director (LSB) Rohini in relation to RTI application ID No. 82 dated 05.03.2009. 
There are numbers of PIOs and subsequently many First Appellate Authorities, but no Central PIO or Central Appellate Authority at DDA. 
1.            If a proper RTI application is made, the same is transferred to many other sub-department(s) without any proper justification and this new sub-department does not provide the required information on time and some times no information is provided at all. 
2.            Even if, the First Appeal is made to the concerned First Appellate Authority, the same is also transferred to other Appellate Authority and all are ready to make the mockery of RTI Act. 
Not only receiving the informations, RTI Act is also effective in making officials accountable for their responsibilities. At the same time and as a fact, this ‘effective tool’ is being manipulated as well distorted by unaccountable DDA officials for not providing the informations also. 
Although CIC office can better answer but I am confident that maximum numbers of RTI applications are being filled at DDA and as the RTI applications are not properly/ satisfactorily answered by DDA, Second Appeal with CIC may also be highest in number against DDA. Respected Sir, I am sure that CIC will take a note of above and issue suitable directions in this regard. 
With regards,
(Rahul Gupta)        Date:  20.05.2009
158, Munirka Vihar, New Delhi – 110067 Mobile: 09811071782
E-mail: cipherbox@hotmail.com 

Sample Letter of Request for Information


Sample Letter of Request for Information
                                                                                              Your address      
         
[Insert date]
The Central / State Public Information Officer
Name of the relevant public authority
Address
(You can submit this request to the Manager(Customer care centre) of a designated post-office-in respect of
Central Government departments having no offices in your place of stay.)*
                                     Request under the Right to Information Act
Dear Public Information Officer :
Under the Right to Information Act 2005,Section 6, please provide me the
following information (here, clearly describe the information you require and
the period to which it relates.).
I prefer to receive the information in the form:(Xerox copy / printout / diskette /
floppy / tape / video cassette / certified copies of documents or records/certified
samples of material/ I would like to take notes or extracts) by post/ email/in
person.
OR
I would like to inspect the following works/documents/records.(clearly describe
what you want to inspect ) . Please inform me a suitable date and time for my
visit.
Initial request fee under s6(1): Rs.______paid in cash/cheque/banker’s draft/Indian
Postal Order/treasury challan ( give details ).
OR
I am a person below poverty line. (attach a photocopy of the proof ).I need not
pay fees.
 
(optional) I am sensorily disabled. Kindly provide me appropriate assistance to
enable access to the information ( reading aloud/in Braille )
Thank you.
Yours faithfully,
[ Your name ]

SC judgement of appointment of Information Commissioners

SUBHASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL 
Supreme Court verdict on appointment of Information Commissioners is likely to induce some practical problems, and necessary clarifications are immediately required for Information Commissions to continue functioning normally.

Presently Central Information Commission has eight Information Commissioners out of total sanctioned strength of eleven, with none of them from judicial background as per standards defined in the court-verdict. To constitute double-bench with compulsion to have a judicial-member, at least eight judicial members are required to be appointed to sit with present eight Information Commissioners which is impossible in present set-up having maximum strength of eleven including Chief information Commissioner. Another problem will emerge because retirement-age of Supreme court Judge and Information Commissioner is same at 65 years, and there is move to increase retirement-age of High Court judges also at 65 years making it impossible to find retired judges to be appointed as Information Commissioners.

Retired bureaucrats were by and large handling RTI petitions quite well because of their earlier experience in bureaucracy to be well aware with irregularities and flaws in system. With changed role as transparency-watchdogs, many of their orders exposed scams and irregularities apart from having an effective check on future such happenings. Now with Information Commissioners with judicial background, it should be ensured that unhealthy court-culture of adjournments may not find place at Information Commissions where adjournments are very rare.

Compulsion of Division Bench is likely to increase backlog at Information Commissioners to an unmanageable situation firstly because two Information Commissioners will be needed for each hearing, and secondly consultation amongst two Information Commissioners will take much more time in a hearing than is with a bench of single Information Commissioner. However Supreme Court directions for appointment-process of Information Commissioners to begin much before the vacancy to be occurred, is welcome.

Thursday, September 13, 2012

HC notice to Sanskriti school for not admitting two EWS pupils


Press Trust of India / New Delhi September 12, 2012, 21:05
The Delhi High Court today issued notices to the city government and Sanskriti School on a plea of man challenging denial of admission to his two children under the economically weaker section (EWS) quota.
A bench of justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Vipin Sanghi also sought responses of Directorate of Education (DoE) and Land and Development department to the man's plea and slated it for hearing on September 24.
East Delhi resident Anit Kumar Bahuty in his plea said his son Aniket and daughter Sweta have been "illegally" denied admission by Sanskriti school in classes VI and IV respectively in academic year 2012-13.
"The school is situated on a public land allotted by the L&DO against Rs one only as annual rent with the condition that it will provide admission to the children of economically weaker section to the extent of 25% (of its intake capacity) and grant them free-ship.
"Despite the fact that the school in this academic year has taken 8 fresh admissions in both classes IV and VI but no student under EWS category has been admitted which is illegal and in breach of the conditions for land allotment", said Ashok Agarwal, the counsel for Bahuty.
The petition alleged that the decision of the school was in violation of an earlier judgement of the court and the DoE guidelines which provided for admissions of EWS category students to schools, built on subsidised government land.
The school earlier had taken the plea that the vacancies in class IV and VI were filled by the wards of the government servants who came to Delhi on transfer and there was no vacancy under the EWS category.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

The rich who bought poverty: Wealthy parents and officials face action after Mail Today exposes fake certificates being used for school admissions Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2201768/The-rich-bought-poverty-Wealthy-parents-officials-face-action-Mail-Today-expose-fake-certificates-used-school-admissions.

Ramesh Kumar (name changed) stays with his family in a plush apartment in upscale Gulmohar Park. He sends his daughter to one of the best schools in the city in his luxury car, but does not spend a penny towards her school fees.
Meet the poor rich beneficiaries of the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) in the National Capital. 
They have all the comforts and luxuries in the world besides a government certificate endorsing their 'poor status'. 

An internal probe being carried out by the Delhi government has revealed several 'glaring cases' where persons, not even remotely disadvantaged, have procured the EWS certificates and are using them to avail subsidised education for their children in some of the top public schools in the city. 
Two separate Delhi government departments – education and revenue – are now ascertaining the exact number of such students and the veracity of these 'prima facie howlers'. 
While it is clear that the government officials who approved the 'undeserving' candidates for EWS certificates will face criminal prosecution, it is also being examined if the parents, who actually procured the document, can be prosecuted.

As for the students admitted to schools on the basis of such false EWS certificates, the most 'prevalent' view among senior government officials is that they should be allowed to continue if their guardians pay the general category fee for the entire duration of their schooling as an EWS student. Most of the false EWS certificates were used by parents to admit their children in the academic session 2011-12 and 2012-13. 
The schools which admitted such students, however, will not face any action as they accepted a genuine certificate provided by the state government.
Mail Today managed to access some of the EWS certificates and the attached verification reports that are now being probed. 

The EWS or income certificates are meant for families with less than Rs 1 lakh annual earning.
It allows the beneficiaries In Ramesh Kumar's case, the surveyor found him to be staying in Gulmohar Park for over 20 years and recommended rejection of his application. 
Despite this, the applicant was issued the certificate by the authorities. In another case, the verification official went to F-block in Lado Sarai, south Delhi, and rejected the case. 
He cautioned: 'Applicant has given Lado Sarai address only for admission purpose.' The story is no different in another case in Lajpat Nagar II where the verification official observed that the applicant was staying in an 'upper middleclass locality and the standard of living was good'. He wrote in his report that the applicant pretended to belong to the lower income group, but the ground reality was totally different. 

Delhi's divisional commissioner Vijay Dev admitted that such irregularities had come to light and promised prompt and severe action. 
'All these glaring cases came to our notice only recently and a probe is on to identify the culprits,' Dev said. 
He questioned the logic behind issuing EWS certificates to candidates who 'didn't even get a favourable verification report'. 
'In all such cases, prima facie, it seems that action can be taken against the local administrative staff for issuing such certificates. Given the importance of the issue, it was recently raised at a meeting with the education department and we will jointly address it in a few days,' Dev said. 
According to sources, the education department too has made a tentative list of students with an 'iffy' EWS background.
'The list was made after schools and others noticed certain EWS candidates coming to school in private cars,' a senior education department official said. 
Senior government officials said before any action is taken or announced, the suspects would be given a 'fair hearing and a chance to explain'.
If they fail, they would face action. Delhi chief secretary P.K. Tripathi, too, accepted that it was a serious issue and assured strict action in all such cases that came to the government's notice.
'In future, we can also examine the possibility of making the process of issuing EWS certificates a bit stricter through involvement of gazetted officers to ensure that such government facilities are availed of by the right candidates,' Tripathi said. 
Mail Today had recently exposed how the EWS certificates could be bought for just Rs 5,000.
In order to get these certificates, one would have to go through an extensive network of touts that is forever present around the offices of the subdivisional magistrate and district collector in the city. access to several government schemes and benefits.
An underprivileged family can apply for the EWS certificates at the local sub-divisional magistrate's office on a plain paper, accompanied by an affidavit and Delhi residence proof. 
Each of these applications is verified by the local office staff who make a visit to the address to ascertain the claim of the applicant. 
However, contrary to the norms, the certificates have been issued despite negative verification reports by the surveyor.



Saturday, September 1, 2012

Police torture of a Dalit family at their residence


ISSUES: Torture; inhuman and degrading treatment; corruption; impunity
SAMPLE LETTER:
Dear __________,
INDIA: Kindly investigate the case of torture of three Dalit persons by the West Bengal state police
Names of victims:
1. Mr. Dulal Sarkar, son of Mr. Bhaduri Sarkar;
2. Ms. Parbati Sarkar, wife of Dulal Sarkar;
3. Mr. Prafulla Sarkar, son of Bhasaram Sarkar;
4. Mr. Kalipada Durani, son of Late Balaram Durani;
All are from the Scheduled Caste community (Dalits) and from the village Udaynagar Colony, Jalangi Police Station, Murshidabad district, West Bengal state
Names of alleged perpetrators:1. Mr. Bahar Ali, Sub-Inspector of Police Berhampore Police Station
2. Mr. Shyamaprosad Saha, Officer-in-Charge Jalangi Police Station
3. Mr. Kajisaheb, Second Officer of Jalangi Police Station
4. Six other police officers from Jalangi Police Station
Date of incident: 11 January 2012 at about 11 pm
Place of incident: In the houses of the victims in Udaynagar Colony village
I am writing to express concern regarding yet another case of police torture and fabricated charges registered by the West Bengal state police against three Dalits. The details of the case are as follows:
The fact-finding report by MASUM provides the following facts. On 11 January at about 11 pm about nine police officers including Mr. Bahar Ali, Sub-Inspector of Police Berhampore Police Station and Mr. Shyamaprosad Saha, the Officer-in-Charge and Mr. Kajisaheb, the Second Officer at Jalangi Police Station forcibly entered the house of the victim, Mr. Dulal Sarkar, by breaking open the door of the house. The officers arrested Sarkar and started assaulting him.
The police tied Dulal with a rope and dragged him on the ground with force. Dulal's wife Ms. Parbati Sarkar, tried to intervene to save her husband from the police. But the officers abused her using filthy language and assaulted her with a wooden stick, fisted and kicked her. There were no female police officers in the police team.
The police then destroyed household articles kept inside the house. Then the police moved to the house of Mr. Prafulla Sarkar, son of Bhasaram Sarkar and Mr. Kalipada Durani, son of Late Balaram Durani and assaulted them brutally at their home. There too the police destroyed household articles. Then the police personnel brought Dulal, Prafulla and Kalipada to Berhampore Police Station and later produced them before the local magistrate after implicating them in a criminal case, vide Berhampore Police Station Case no. 1351/2011 dated 23 November 2011, registered under sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and also under sections 25 and 28 of the Indian Arms Act.
At the time of arrest, the police did not disclose any reason for the arrest. It is further revealed that the police also manufactured records showing different place and time of the arrest in order to suppress their misdeeds.
Mr. Govinda Sarkar, the elder brother Dulal, lodged a written compliant before the Superintendent of Police, Murshidabad regarding the incident of police torture upon the victims. But till date there has been neither any enquiry nor action taken by the Superintendent of Police, Murshidabad over the complaint. Parbati Sarkar, Dulal's wife who had suffered injuries as a result of the assault is receiving medical treatment at the moment.
It is also revealed in the fact-finding that the victims are poor and that they are daily wage earners. It is reported that that the victims were falsely implicated in the criminal case out of political vendetta.
I therefore request you:
1. That the statements of the victims are immediately recorded and the case investigated;
2. Immediate criminal actions taken against the officers against torture;
3. The victim who is hurt in the police action be immediately provided medical treatment;
5. All the victims paid interim compensation by the government until permanent arrangements are made to resettle them decently.

Yours sincerely,

Homeland insecurity: fear of civil society in world's largest democracy


ISSUES: Right to liberty; freedom of association; freedom of expression; human rights defenders; impunity; legislation; prosecution system; democracy; minorities; caste-based discrimination; threats and intimidation
SAMPLE LETTER:
Dear __________,
INDIA: Please investigate the "show cause" notice served against Ms Madhuri Krishnaswami and Jagrit Adivasi Dalit Sangathan (JADS) in Barwani district, Madya Pradesh under the Madya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam (Madya Pradesh State Security Act, 1990) as well as the constitutionality of the Act in question
A "show cause" notice numbered 876/xxx/2012 was served against Ms Madhuri Krishnaswami on 10 May 2012 by District Magistrate Barwani. This notice demands justification for permitting her to remain in the district when she had been allegedly responsible for disturbing the peace. Although this notice was served to Madhuri in her personal capacity, there is reason to believe that such actions also target a civil society organisation, the Jagrit Adivasi Dalit Sangathan (JADS), an organisation Madhuri leads and against which another "show cause" notice has been served. The JADS is a legitimate people's movement composed of thousands of families, whose collective expulsion would have proven difficult (if not impossible) and expensive for the magistrate to execute, even under Bhopal's instruction. This forced the magistrate to target personalities leading or representing the organisation. It is believed, as such, that Madhuri has been singled out to be made an example of (although this selectivity in itself reveals the absence of true justice in the issuance of the "show cause" notices and the proceedings against JADS).
It is reported that the executive magistrate who served Madhuri the "show cause" notice had been acting merely on the dictate of the state's government, which has decided to use the State Security Act against movements such as JADS. The government stated that "compelling causes" had led them to exercise the Act against JADS and Madhuri; these causes have proven less than completely compelling when subjected to close scrutiny. In an attempt to criminalise her character and shore up support for the state administration's decision, the notice resorts to listing cases in which Madhuri and JADS had been implicated in but acquitted of in the past, as well as to mentioning cases the police have pending against her which have not yet even been presented in court. Such were intended to result in a conclusion or create an impression that Madhuri and JADS commonly carry out criminal activities and would continue to do so in the future. This was designed to justify the state government's position that Madhuri should be banished from Barwani and six contiguous districts.
The reality is that Madhuri has never been convicted of these charges and should not be treated as an offender, much less have such charges used as justification for her expulsion by a state government. This violates spirit and rule of law. The notice also explicitly states that JADS has been "obstructing" government-sponsored development work in the state, although these accusations are equally groundless. The organisation has instead insisted on the proper implementation of welfare schemes and that corruption in the government is investigated and eradicated. The movement has worked to ensure the benefits of welfare schemes reach the tribal communities who have equal right to benefit from such. JADS engages in the education of minority communities and supports their rights, particularly in matters concerning corruption, deforestation, malnutrition, deprivation of just wages and forced eviction. JADS strives to protect the dignity and livelihood of the most vulnerable sectors of society: tribal minorities, women, children, the poor and illiterate. The organisation is therefore a facilitator and stakeholder in the government's initiatives – how and why, then, would they have impeded the work of welfare and development schemes?
Perhaps JADS is feared because it challenges the state bureaucracy's very existence. JADS has, after all, spearheaded (peaceful and perfectly constitutional) protest gatherings against corrupt district administrators who siphon off money intended to alleviate poverty for manual labourers under the national rural employment guarantee scheme. The organisation campaigns against the deliberate neglect of tribal communities by district administration, thus promoting the equality amongst individuals and groups in the community that the district authorities themselves seem unable or unwilling to guarantee. JADS additionally broaches difficult issues of oppression, corruption and abuse of authority; such discourses are seen as a threat to the survival of the local regime.
Beyond the abuse of the Act by provincial authorities, the Act itself is troublingly unconstitutional. It supersedes other institutional safeguards by reducing important questions to a single one of "national security". The oppressive acts by the district authorities against civil society agencies and actors are masked by some supposed concern for public peace and the integrity of the state. Yet the draconian Act is premised on questionable principles and crudely wielded on even more dubious grounds. It permits an executive magistrate unbridled powers to curtail the civil rights of a person, for instance. The executive proceeding may (i) restrict the movements of a person; (ii) restrict the entry of the person to any place within his jurisdiction and areas 'contiguous' to that; (iii) impose conditions upon a person to constrain the individual's freedom of expression and association; (iv) dispossess the person of his/her property; and (v) require the person to sign a security bond. A statutory prohibition in the Act (vide Section 9) further reduces the options available to an aggrieved person, who is made able only to appeal to the state government by order to the executive magistrate. This limits the jurisdiction of courts to intervention only where procedural errors are evident in the executive magistrate's execution of Section 10 of the Act. This Act is patently unjust and, if adequately studied, would fail the test of constitutionality.
This Act negates other constitutional guarantees that otherwise protect an individual from such arbitrary expulsion. The provincial authorities may, in the absence of any proclamation of emergency, restrict the civil liberties of a citizen through a state agent (in this case, the executive magistrate). The Act crucially assumes that the person served the "show cause" notice has already committed an offence. Madhuri, although never convicted of a crime, is assumed anyway to have broken laws to have warranted the service of the notice in the first place. Such circular and self-justifying reasoning is symptomatic of impunity quite distressing to observe, especially at the level of the state.
In the summary procedure stipulated by the Act, law does not require the adjudicating executive officer to write a detailed order reasoning out the judgement. Here, exercise of the Act breaches two fundamental principles of criminal law: (i) presumption of innocence prior to being proven guilty and (ii) impartial adjudication (the roles of prosecutor and adjudicator are filled the same person). As such, no opportunity for defence is provided the accused. This Act accords authorities a form of carte blanche, and is prone to misuse by the authorities thus empowered by it. Thus ingloriously dissected, such an Act is an act indeed, a performance or miming of law which permits puppets in the administration to move, wave and bow to ease the insecurities of a government not robust enough to engage in public debate.
The local government claims this Act is necessary for peace and the prevention of organised crime, yet it serves to inflame more people and generate organised civil resistance, the suppression of which could end in widespread civil unrest. The district authorities do not realise that peace and trust cannot be bought by the trading of lives and liberties, but won through increased transparency and accountability in the government. The government has to realise civil society alone stands against unmitigated violence between the people and a government out of touch with their needs and aspirations. To take civil society out of the equation is tyranny, and tyranny sows seed for a harvest of vitriole, vehemence and violence.
The case against Madhuri and JADS is not an isolated incident. The process adopted by the state is an enactment of a larger pattern of state oppression of people's movements in Madya Pradesh. On at least five occasions, the state has registered a series of false charges against social and political activists, serving them "show cause" notices so their activities could be legally and legitimately (albeit unconstitutionally) stopped. While some cases were eventually withdrawn by state administration, others were fought out in courts. Legislations such as the 1990 Madya Pradesh State Security Act are the government's only response to increased calls for greater accountability and true democracy in India. The reduction of spaces for dissent and expressions of a desire for true democracy mock the foundations upon which India was initially founded. "Show cause" notices are but specific manifestations of the impunity with which bureaucracies behave, and are allowed to behave, toward civil society and the Indian people, and reflect the paralysing insecurity experienced by a corrupt and morally bankrupt state administration.
Fundamental democratic norms demand an individual's right to freedom of expression and association, to freedom of movement and residence within India's borders (Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948, Articles 13, 19 and 20), but there has been great resistance to the internalisation of such norms within India's bureaucracy. Resorting to the invocation of institutional mechanisms, however inapplicable or unconstitutional, to remove such perceived challenges to the authority and legitimacy of local governments not only fails to silence voices of dissent but serves to further highlight the injustices of such a system. How, in an India that boasts of being the world's largest democracy, may healthy, rigorous dialogue, discussion and debate be waged? And what is the cause of such insecurity in the face of a flourishing civil society?
Instead of demanding to know from Madhuri why she should not be exiled from the region, the district authorities should bear the burden of demonstrating reason to expel her. This answers the most basic premise of "innocent until proven guilty". Once that most essential logic has been grasped, further work can be done to review the State Security Act and assess its constitutionality and validity (against Indian law and international law). Should the Act fail that test, the Central Government and provincial authorities should then work together towards repealing it. The state of Madya Pradesh should also seek to review its own institutions and processes, acknowledging the validity and lawful nature of civil society actors and refraining from persecuting them any further. Only when this is accomplished can the local authorities strip off their insecurities, earn the trust of the people and gain legitimacy for themselves.
I therefore demand that:
1. The background in which the "show cause" notices against Ms Madhuri Krishnaswami and JADS are issued be investigated;
2. The provincial authorities reassure Madhuri and JADS constitutional safeguards will take precedence in future proceedings and that the Madya Pradesh State Security Act, 1990 will not be used to intimidate or threaten them;
3. The provincial authorities attempt to engage their constituents through increased dialogue and carry out measures to protect their land and forest rights as well as their rights to freedom of expression, association, movement and residence;
4. The Madya Pradesh State Security Act, 1990 is immediately and thoroughly reviewed at the central government and state level;
5. The Madya Pradesh State Security Act, 1990 is repealed if found to be unconstitutional
Yours sincerely,

Caste-based discrimination against 'untouchable' Ahirwar in Madhya Pradesh


SAMPLE LETTER:
Dear __________,
INDIA: Please investigate the discrimination against 'untouchable' Ahirwar in Madhya Pradesh despite Mid-Day-Meal and other welfare schemes by the government
Name of victims: Ahirwar community in Maregaon Village of Gadarwara Tehsil of Narsinghpur district, Madhya Pradesh
Alleged perpetrators: Lodhi community in Maregaon Village of Gadarwara Tehsil of Narsinghpur district, Madhya Pradesh
Date of incident: 2009 to present (since the consensus by Ahirwar Samaj Mahaparishad to abandon the practice of carrying the carcasses of dead animals)
Place of incident: Maregaon Village of Gadarwara Tehsil of Narsinghpur district, Madhya Pradesh
I am writing to express concern regarding caste-based discrimination and the denial of the right to food to the Ahirwar community of Maregaon Village, Gadarwara Tehsil of Narsinghpur, Madhya Pradesh by the Lodhi community residing in the same village despite attempts by the government to fight hunger and malnutrition in the region through welfare initiatives that would secure employment and food for the most marginalised segments of society.
Yuva Samvad, Nagrik Adhikar Manch and National Secular Forum conducted an investigation on 2 May 2012 in Maregaon Village of Gadarwara Tehsil of Narsinghpur district and uncovered the following details:
Maregoan Village has a population of approximately 2000 individuals. Out of these, 100 families are of the Ahirwar community. Dalits make up most of the agricultural labourers in this area, where Ahirwars (Chamars) compose a majority of the Dalits. The Ahirwar are classified as a Scheduled Caste in India. Ahirwar are spread across Gadarwara and in nearly all adjoining villages, playing an important role in the socioeconomic activities of the region. The Lodhi community in Maregaon village belong to Other Backward Classe (OBC) own farmland and generally hire Ahirwar to cultivate their fields.
Division of labour in the community has resulted in the imposition of certain menial and lowly occupations upon the Ahirwar. For centuries, the Ahirwar have been tasked to do "dirty" jobs such as carrying the carcasses of dead animals. Despite the necessity of such workers, and for forcing them to take up such jobs, the Ahirwar are seen as being tainted by death and greatly despised. The Ahirwar were made to live in a hamlet separated from the main village.
In 2009, the Ahirwar Samaj Mahaparishad built a consensus among the Ahirwar community to abandon the practice of carrying the carcasses dead animals and shake off the label of "untouchable" imposed by the dominant castes. This decision was first acted upon by three or four individuals and was soon claimed by other Ahirwar. In response, individuals from higher castes began a social and economic boycott against the Ahirwar. The Ahirwar were not permitted to pass through the village and were forced to take a longer route in order to travel to other villages. The Ahirwar were prohibited from taking rations from the local shopkeeper; even the local milk vendor was intimidated by the Lodhi into not selling milk to the Ahirwar. The Ahirwar were even more cruelly persecuted through the denial of water from the hand pump located near the village temple. Prior to their decision to abandon the practice of carrying the carcasses of dead animals, the Ahirwar were still permitted to use this hand pump because there had been two at the time and the villagers were not facing a shortage of water. Today, the Lodhi have fenced in and put wire around the temple and areas surrounding it – this includes the hand pump the Ahirwar depended on for their water. In addition to such mistreatment and deprivation, the Ahirwar were further prohibited from using water from a communal water tank. This tank was also fenced in with wire by the Lodhi. The Ahirwar's cattle were also not permitted to partake of water from the tank. The Ahirwar face a severe shortage of water at this present time.
Children of the lower castes are forced to clean the school while children from higher castes are not. The school also discriminates through seating arrangements in class. To exacerbate the situation, the cook engaged in cooking the Mid-Day-Meal in Maregaon Village is a Lodhi. Despite efforts by authorities to relieve malnutrition in the area by implementing a Mid-Day-Meal scheme, the Ahirwar children who most require the sustenance are discriminated against. They are served only leftovers, if there are any, and the food is given to them from a distance. The Ahirwar children are also forced to bring their own plates while other students from the dominant castes are served from plates provided by the school. The children from the Ahirwar community are also fed insufficient amounts of food and punished for asking for more. Instead of the social, economic and intellectual progress that might be expected in the world's largest democracy, Madhya Pradesh looks increasingly like Dickensian London. "Please, sir, I want some more" – will the authorities intervene before the Ahirwar children's cries die out, or will it participate in the silencing of such cries for help by refusing to?
Finally, the report exposes shockingly poor implementation of the Apex Court's orders concerning the Government Food, Employment and Welfare Schemes to prevent hunger and malnutrition among the people of Maregaon Village. Central to this failure has been the wrong identification of Below Poverty Line (BPL) families. Of the more than 100 Ahirwar families who conduct manual labour for a living, only 20-25 families have been issues the PBL card. Many live in terrible conditions and should also be included on the BPL list but have not been. Most Ahirwar are deprived of the benefits of the government scheme that targets BPL families. The Ahirwar have job cards but only two to three individuals have found employment under the NREGA scheme while the rest languish, unemployed and "unemployable" due to their caste affiliation. So far local officials have not acted to discipline such blatant acts of discrimination and assure the Ahirwar of protection against future abuses.
Although plans and efforts by the government to alleviate hunger and malnutrition are commendable, the government should also pursue the goal of correct implementation of such schemes. To foolproof the programme would be the only responsible thing to do, especially in light of the recent reports made against abuses in the system. While the government may not actively discriminate against the Ahirwar, to passively watch other actors do so – to refuse to act – is a betrayal of a common humanity; it means to be complicit in such acts of violence and inhuman, degrading treatment. This is unforgiveable for an administration powerful enough to carry out punitive actions against perpetrators and practically assist this neglected and long-oppressed segment of society.
Rights are not merely privileges; they are entitlements. And the Ahirwar have been robbed of these entitlements. The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) laid out some guidelines concerning the protection of the protection of individuals' fundamental rights. By virtue of being human, the Ahirwar are, "without distinction", fully entitled to enjoy such rights and liberties as set forth in the Declaration, and the Indian state is expected to bear the responsibility of providing access to and protection of such rights (Article 2). Relevant to this case of discrimination are Articles 3, 4, 5, 23 and 25, which collectively assert that every human has a right to life, liberty and security of person, work, free choice of employment, just and favourable conditions of work, protection against unemployment, equal pay for equal work, just remuneration for an existence worthy of human dignity, a standard of living adequate for health and well-being, including food, housing, medical care, social services and security in the event of unemployment or lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control. Children are entitled to special care and assistance. The Ahirwar also have rights against servitude and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
The 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which India ratified in 1979, reiterate such rights in Articles 6 (right to life, protected by law), 7 (right against cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment), 8 (right against servitude and forced or compulsory labour), 24 (right of the child to protection without discrimination), 26 (all persons are equal before the law and are entitled without discrimination to the equal protection of the law). The Indian state is bound by international law to upholding these rights.
India's own Constitution declaims discrimination on grounds of religion, race, sex, place of birth and caste. Article 15(2) (a) and (b) state that no citizen shall be denied access to the use of wells, tanks, bathing ghats, roads and public places dedicated to the use of the general public. Article 15(3) and (4) go further still to endorse affirmative action and promote special provisions for the most vulnerable sectors of Indian society: women, children, members of socially and educationally backward classes of citizens, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes. Article 16 stipulates "equality of opportunity in matters of public employment" and also permits positive discrimination to increase the participation and representation of the same vulnerable groups of individuals in the civil service but also prohibiting discrimination on the grounds already mentioned. Article 17 of the Indian Constitution crucially abolishes "untouchability", a most extreme form of discrimination wherein the lowest caste in society is deemed "unclean", shunned and ostracised. Article 17 is not only stating an ideal to be worked towards – it categorically and permanently criminalises such a practice. Yet this label continues to blight the lives of hundreds of thousands in India, and persist as reality for the Ahirwar in Madhya Pradesh. It is an impossible and soul-destroying reality that disgraces India. It is a reality that can and should be fought by the government's every last ounce of strength and willpower.
Entire paradigms must be radically altered for real and sustainable change. Man has to recognise above all things the equality and inherent dignity of fellow Man. Only by acknowledging a common humanity can we hope to evade the violence that proceeds from other exclusive and necessarily reductive identities (religious, ethnic, linguistic, gender, national, political affiliations). The residents of Maregaon Village can begin to mend the rifts in their commmunity's social fabric by permitting the Ahirwar occupations of their own choosing, by paying the Ahirwar for services rendered and by learning to dissociate the derogatory label of "untouchable" from menial but freely chosen jobs. Such critical re-evaluation of their beliefs would not only restore the dignity of the Ahirwar but serve the dominant class by freeing them to participate in free market systems, to have healthy and peaceable relationships with their neighbours. As with all social reform, this will take effort and time. Yet the state bears a more immediate obligation to its people, to the Ahirwar. The state must release the Ahirwar from their servitude, inhuman and degrading treatment, poor standards of living and oppression at the hands of the Lodhi. Without urgent intervention, the Ahirwar and their children face continued caste-based discrimination and an uncertain future.
The suffering of the Ahirwar must be quickly addressed. I therefore demand that:
1. Proper implementation of existing welfare schemes providing food and employment is ensured by officials through close monitoring of such activities at the level of the village;
2. Officials should send inspectors at regular intervals to monitor the discrimination faced by Ahirwar children in schools and during mid-day meals;
3. The Ahirwar should also be interviewed to determine how many are currently being coerced into taking up certain jobs or who are not being (fairly) paid;
4. The police who wield jurisdiction over the area exercise their authority and see to the removal of the fences and wires that separate the Ahirwar and their cattle from life-sustaining water;
5. Families living in squalid conditions and obviously below the poverty line be given their ration cards at the earliest possible moment;
6. The persons responsible for intimidating the milk and provision shop vendors, for erecting the fences and wires around the water pumps and tanks are immediately investigated, arrested and punished;
7. Adequate protection is provided for the Ahirwar against possible retaliatory attacks or boycotts from members of the dominant castes in the village and adequate fiscal compensation, food and water is provided that will enable the Ahirwar to regain their health and be able to resume work.
8. The Gadarwara district administration should ensure social boycotts of the Ahirwar are not repeated in the future through the introduction of long-term educational/publicity efforts to communicate the basic concepts of human and constitutional rights to residents of Maregaon Village and other areas around India where such caste-based discrimination is prevalent, as well as by carrying out punitive legal action against individuals who persist in their discrimination against the Ahirwar;
9. The Gadarwara district administration should arrange to have dead animals picked up and disposed of from rural areas since the Ahirwar have identified the activity as one of the main reasons for the discrimination against them and have voluntarily decided against continuing to do the job
If the authorities act on the recommendations above, Indian society may come to realise that common humanity should inspire compassion and respect for others, regardless of their gender, occupation and political, religious, linguistic, caste or ethnic affiliations. This will pave the way for cooperation and a lasting peace, which will in turn create an environment conducive to national progress. This will also have the effort of highlighting the government's resolve to uphold rule of law in India, increasing its legitimacy amongst the Indian people, and signal to the international community India's continued commitment to international treaties and obligations.
Yours sincerely,