Sub: Application under the RTI Act, 2005
Sir,
Please provide the following information:
1. List of all complaints received by the Lokaukta during the period 1.1.09 to 31.8.12 containing brief
description of complaint, whether complaint was anonymous, date of complaint, details (name
and designation) of official or authority complained against.
Please provide the following information:
1. List of all complaints received by the Lokaukta during the period 1.1.09 to 31.8.12 containing brief
description of complaint, whether complaint was anonymous, date of complaint, details (name
and designation) of official or authority complained against.
2. Which of the above complaints were rejected immediately and which ones were taken up for
subsequent investigations? Date of initiating investigations or brief reasons for rejecting, as the
case may be.
subsequent investigations? Date of initiating investigations or brief reasons for rejecting, as the
case may be.
3. Which one of those taken up for subsequent investigations, have been closed? Brief reasons for
closing each one of them.
closing each one of them.
4. According to various laws, guidelines, rules, procedures, manuals etc, in how much time should
an investigation be completed after its receipt ? Please provide copies of such guidelines,
which prescribe time limits for various stages starting from receipt of a complaint up to filing of
prosecution or imposition of penalties.
an investigation be completed after its receipt ? Please provide copies of such guidelines,
which prescribe time limits for various stages starting from receipt of a complaint up to filing of
prosecution or imposition of penalties.
5. How many total cases have been received in the Commission since 1.1.09. How many of them
were rejected immediately and which ones were taken up for subsequent investigations? In how
many of those cases taken up for subsequent investigations, were the above time limits followed?
were rejected immediately and which ones were taken up for subsequent investigations? In how
many of those cases taken up for subsequent investigations, were the above time limits followed?
6. How many government officials were suspended for corruption from period 1.1.09 to 31.8.12,
what was the action taken against them?
aanganwadi kendra
Information, to be asked:-
1. Whether Ms. Julie Kumari’s Std X board certificate was verified from concerned board/council?
2. Please provide me the date, when the AAM SABHA of the panchayat was called for the approval of her appointment as sewika? Also provide me the minutes/document of the same, duly signed by all ward members of the panchayat.
If the AAM SABHA of the panchayat, was not called, then please provide the criterion or quota, under which Ms Julie Kumari was appointed as a Sewika.
If the AAM SABHA of the panchayat, was not called, then please provide the criterion or quota, under which Ms Julie Kumari was appointed as a Sewika.
3. Please provide the names of the people, who approved the above-said person’s appointment.
4. Please provide me the date of appointment of Ms Julie Kumari for the above said post.
5. Please provide me the information, on whether the seat for the post of Sewika, was reserved for other categories like SC,ST,OBC.
6. If the seat was reserved, please provide me a copy of the reservation roaster ,and details of other candidates, who had applied for the same post.
6. If the seat was reserved, please provide me a copy of the reservation roaster ,and details of other candidates, who had applied for the same post.
So, these information are to be sought from the said officer.
No comments:
Post a Comment